Risk factors for overuse injuries in a cohort of elite Swedish track and field athletes

• Published in: BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 1 - 73
• Main Authors: Lundberg Zachrisson, Andreas, Ivarsson, Andreas, Desai, Pia, Karlsson, Jon, Grau, Stefan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 08.07.2021; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Ankle; Athletes; Biomechanics; Cumulative trauma disorders; definitions; effect sizes; Flexibility; hip; human joint motion; Idrottsvetenskap; Injuries; isb recommendation; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Overuse injuries; Range of motion; Rehabilitation; Risk factors; runners; Running; Sensors; Software; Sport and Fitness Sciences; Sport Sciences; Sports injuries; Track & field; Track and field; Track and field athletes; Track and field athletics; Sweden
• ISSN: 2052-1847; 2052-1847
• DOI: 10.1186/s13102-021-00297-x

Background Most injuries in track and field are caused by overuse with conflicting reports concerning the underlying mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how biomechanical and clinical factors relate to the risk of overuse injuries, and to investigate whether the relationships between potential risk factors and injury become stronger if injuries are grouped by location. Methods The study is a prospective cohort study conducted during a Swedish track and field season over eleven months, from October to August. The cohort consisted of elite male and female track and field athletes competing in either middle- and long-distance running, sprinting, jumping, or throwing events (n = 96). Athletes performed a baseline screening at enrollment consisting of a clinical examination, running, and strength tests. Injury data was collected during the season by medical professionals and divided according to their anatomical location into upper-body, thigh/hip, knee, or foot/shank injuries. Results Thirty-four (54.8%) injuries where located at the foot/shank, followed by sixteen injuries at the thigh/hip (25.8%). Only eight knee (12.9%) and four upper-body (6.5%) injuries were registered during the season and therefore not analysed. Effect sizes were calculated for all test variables. Small effect sizes (r.sub.pb = .10-.23) were found for eleven risk factors between the overall injured (all injuries combined) and non-injured athletes. By further sub-grouping the injured group into thigh/hip injuries, effect size increased in hip adduction range of motion knee flexion velocity and the muscle flexibility of the iliopsoas. For foot/shank injuries, only the hamstring:quadriceps strength ratios increased for the right side to a small effect size. Conclusions Injury grouping appears to increase effect size for certain risk factors. Athletes with a slower knee flexion velocity during stance phase were more likely to become injured (p-value <.03, r.sub.pb = .37). An increased cohort size to further sub-divide injuries into specific diagnoses is needed. Keywords: Overuse injuries, Track and field, Risk factors, Biomechanics