Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells for COVID‐19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: A double‐blind, phase 1/2a, randomized controlled trial

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in COVID‐19 is associated with high mortality. Mesenchymal stem cells are known to exert immunomodulatory and anti‐inflammatory effects and could yield beneficial effects in COVID‐19 ARDS. The objective of this study was to determine safety and explore effi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStem cells translational medicine Vol. 10; no. 5; pp. 660 - 673
Main Authors Lanzoni, Giacomo, Linetsky, Elina, Correa, Diego, Messinger Cayetano, Shari, Alvarez, Roger A., Kouroupis, Dimitrios, Alvarez Gil, Ana, Poggioli, Raffaella, Ruiz, Phillip, Marttos, Antonio C., Hirani, Khemraj, Bell, Crystal A., Kusack, Halina, Rafkin, Lisa, Baidal, David, Pastewski, Andrew, Gawri, Kunal, Leñero, Clarissa, Mantero, Alejandro M. A., Metalonis, Sarah W., Wang, Xiaojing, Roque, Luis, Masters, Burlett, Kenyon, Norma S., Ginzburg, Enrique, Xu, Xiumin, Tan, Jianming, Caplan, Arnold I., Glassberg, Marilyn K., Alejandro, Rodolfo, Ricordi, Camillo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.05.2021
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in COVID‐19 is associated with high mortality. Mesenchymal stem cells are known to exert immunomodulatory and anti‐inflammatory effects and could yield beneficial effects in COVID‐19 ARDS. The objective of this study was to determine safety and explore efficacy of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell (UC‐MSC) infusions in subjects with COVID‐19 ARDS. A double‐blind, phase 1/2a, randomized, controlled trial was performed. Randomization and stratification by ARDS severity was used to foster balance among groups. All subjects were analyzed under intention to treat design. Twenty‐four subjects were randomized 1:1 to either UC‐MSC treatment (n = 12) or the control group (n = 12). Subjects in the UC‐MSC treatment group received two intravenous infusions (at day 0 and 3) of 100 ± 20 × 106 UC‐MSCs; controls received two infusions of vehicle solution. Both groups received best standard of care. Primary endpoint was safety (adverse events [AEs]) within 6 hours; cardiac arrest or death within 24 hours postinfusion). Secondary endpoints included patient survival at 31 days after the first infusion and time to recovery. No difference was observed between groups in infusion‐associated AEs. No serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed related to UC‐MSC infusions. UC‐MSC infusions in COVID‐19 ARDS were found to be safe. Inflammatory cytokines were significantly decreased in UC‐MSC‐treated subjects at day 6. Treatment was associated with significantly improved patient survival (91% vs 42%, P = .015), SAE‐free survival (P = .008), and time to recovery (P = .03). UC‐MSC infusions are safe and could be beneficial in treating subjects with COVID‐19 ARDS.
Bibliography:Funding information
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant/Award Numbers: UL1TR002736, UL1TR000460; Ugo Colombo; Simkins Family Foundation; Fondazione Silvio Tronchetti Provera; Barilla Group and Family; Diabetes Research Institute Foundation (DRIF); The Cure Alliance; North America's Building Trades Unions (NABTU)
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Funding information National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant/Award Numbers: UL1TR002736, UL1TR000460; Ugo Colombo; Simkins Family Foundation; Fondazione Silvio Tronchetti Provera; Barilla Group and Family; Diabetes Research Institute Foundation (DRIF); The Cure Alliance; North America's Building Trades Unions (NABTU)
ISSN:2157-6564
2157-6580
2157-6580
DOI:10.1002/sctm.20-0472