382605张门诊处方点评与分析

目的：了解门诊处方的质量和用药情况,促进处方书写规范化、标准化,提高处方质量,促进临床合理用药。方法：抽取2013年广东省人民医院惠福分院门诊处方共382 605张,对其进行点评与分析,采取图表方式进行分类统计,解析门诊处方存在的问题。结果：382 605张处方中,不合理处方286张,占0.07%。286张不合理处方中,用药不适宜处方所占比例最大,共191张,占66.78%。高、中级职称医师处方合理率相当,均高于初级职称医师;肿瘤科处方合理率较低,为99.19%（2 923/2 947）。结论：门诊处方基本合理,但仍存在较多问题,根据情况应加大《处方管理办法》的实施力度,加强对处方的监督、检查...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in中国医院用药评价与分析 no. 10; pp. 1409 - 1411
Main Author 文睿 张俊芳 何思缘
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 广东省医学科学院/广东省人民医院惠福分院西药房,广东广州,510080%广东药学院2013届药学本科毕业生,广东广州,510006 2015
Subjects
合理用药
处方点评
门诊处方
合理用药
处方点评
Outpatient prescriptions
门诊处方
Review of prescriptions
Rational drug use
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:目的：了解门诊处方的质量和用药情况,促进处方书写规范化、标准化,提高处方质量,促进临床合理用药。方法：抽取2013年广东省人民医院惠福分院门诊处方共382 605张,对其进行点评与分析,采取图表方式进行分类统计,解析门诊处方存在的问题。结果：382 605张处方中,不合理处方286张,占0.07%。286张不合理处方中,用药不适宜处方所占比例最大,共191张,占66.78%。高、中级职称医师处方合理率相当,均高于初级职称医师;肿瘤科处方合理率较低,为99.19%（2 923/2 947）。结论：门诊处方基本合理,但仍存在较多问题,根据情况应加大《处方管理办法》的实施力度,加强对处方的监督、检查,提高处方质量,促进合理用药。
Bibliography:OBJECTIVE： To investigate the quality of outpatient prescriptions and medications,and to promote standardization of prescription writing then improve the quality of prescription,so as to promote clinical rational drug use. METHODS： 382 605 outpatient prescriptions in Guangdong General Hospital Huifu Branch in 2013 were collected to make the review and analysis,charts were took to make the classified statistic,problems in outpatient prescriptions were analyzed. RESULTS： Of the 382 605 outpatient prescriptions,unqualified prescriptions were 286,accounting for 0. 07%; among which the prescriptions with inappropriate medications took the largest proportion,totally191 prescriptions,accounting for 66. 78%. The high title and medium title physicians had the same pass rates,which were both higher than that of the elementary title physicians; the pass rate of prescriptions was low in the oncology,accounting for 99. 19%（ 2 923 /2 947）. CONCLUSIONS： The outpatient prescriptions were basically rational,but there were sti
ISSN:1672-2124
DOI:10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2015.10.044