Assessment of interfractional prostate motion in patients immobilized in the prone position using a thermoplastic shell

• Published in: Journal of radiation research Vol. 55; no. 1; pp. 168 - 174
• Main Authors: Ikeda, Itaru, Mizowaki, Takashi, Sawada, Yohei, Nakata, Manabu, Norihisa, Yoshiki, Ogura, Masakazu, Hiraoka, Masahiro
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Oxford University Press 01.01.2014
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analysis; Calcification; Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging; Equivalence; Humans; Immobilization - instrumentation; Male; Mathematical analysis; Middle Aged; Patient Positioning - instrumentation; Patients; Prone Position; Prostate; Prostate - diagnostic imaging; Prostate cancer; Prostatic Diseases - diagnostic imaging; Radiation Protection - instrumentation; Radiotherapy; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Technology; Thermoplastic resins; Thermoplastics; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation; X-rays; interfractional prostate motion; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; prostate cancer; prone position; thermoplastic shell
• ISSN: 0449-3060; 1349-9157
• DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrt089

The aim of this study was to evaluate the interfractional prostate motion of patients immobilized in the prone position using a thermoplastic shell. A total of 24 patients with prostate calcifications detectable using a kilo-voltage X-ray image-guidance system (ExacTrac X-ray system) were examined. Daily displacements of the calcification within the prostate relative to pelvic bony structures were calculated by the ExacTrac X-ray system. The average displacement and standard deviation (SD) in each of the left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions were calculated for each patient. Based on the results of interfractional prostate motion, we also calculated planning target volume (PTV) margins using the van Herk formula and examined the validity of the PTV margin of our institute (a 9-mm margin everywhere except posteriorly, where a 6-mm margin was applied). In total, 899 data measurements from 24 patients were obtained. The average prostate displacements ± SD relative to bony structures were 2.8 ± 3.3, −2.0 ± 2.0 and 0.2 ± 0.4 mm, in the SI, AP and LR directions, respectively. The required PTV margins were 9.7, 6.1 and 1.4 mm in the SI, AP and LR directions, respectively. The clinical target volumes of 21 patients (87.5%) were located within the PTV for 90% or more of all treatment sessions. Interfractional prostate motion in the prone position with a thermoplastic shell was equivalent to that reported for the supine position. The PTV margin of our institute is considered appropriate for alignment, based on bony structures.