Multiples and parents of multiples prefer same arm randomization of siblings in neonatal trials

Objective: Although common among Neonatal Intensive Care Units, multiples births are randomized inconsistently within trials, which can impact enrollment, analytical approach and trial outcomes. It is not known what randomization approach (same arm, different arm and independent randomization) is pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of perinatology Vol. 35; no. 3; pp. 208 - 213
Main Authors Bernardo, J, Nowacki, A, Martin, R, Fanaroff, J M, Hibbs, A M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Nature Publishing Group US 01.03.2015
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: Although common among Neonatal Intensive Care Units, multiples births are randomized inconsistently within trials, which can impact enrollment, analytical approach and trial outcomes. It is not known what randomization approach (same arm, different arm and independent randomization) is preferred by multiples and their families. Study design: Surveys distributed to parents of multiples and adult multiples addressed the preferences on randomization by eliciting the most desired method and likelihood of enrolling twins for each randomization approach. Result: Populations included 209 parents and 321 adult multiples. Seventy-eight percent of parents and 59% of multiples prefer same arm placement of multiples over other methods (both P <0.001), which also had highest likelihood of enrollment among both the groups. Conclusion: Parents of multiples and adult multiples prefer placement of multiples into same treatment arm in randomized trials, making such methodology a potential way to optimize consent rates while ethically approaching human subject research.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0743-8346
1476-5543
DOI:10.1038/jp.2014.192