The potential cost-effectiveness of novel cord blood therapies in children with autism spectrum disorder

To model the long-term clinical and economic outcomes of potential cord blood therapy in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Markov microsimulation of ASD over the lifespan was used to compare two strategies: 1) standard of care (SOC), including behavioral and educational interventions, and 2) novel cor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 18; no. 4; p. e0282906
Main Authors Borre, Ethan D, Myers, Evan, Hamilton Lopez, Marianne, Kurtzberg, Joanne, Shaz, Beth, Troy, Jesse, Sanders Schmidler, Gillian D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 18.04.2023
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To model the long-term clinical and economic outcomes of potential cord blood therapy in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Markov microsimulation of ASD over the lifespan was used to compare two strategies: 1) standard of care (SOC), including behavioral and educational interventions, and 2) novel cord blood (CB) intervention in addition to SOC. Input data reflecting behavioral outcomes included baseline Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (VABS-3), monthly VABS-3 changes, and CB intervention efficacy on adaptive behavior based on a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (DukeACT). Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were correlated to VABS-3. Costs for children with ASD ($15,791, ages 2-17 years) and adults with ASD ($56,559, ages 18+ years), and the CB intervention (range $15,000-45,000) were incorporated. Alternative CB efficacy and costs were explored. We compared model-projected results to published data on life-expectancy, mean VABS-3 changes, and lifetime costs. Undiscounted lifetime QALYs in the SOC and CB strategies were 40.75 and 40.91. Discounted lifetime costs in the SOC strategy were $1,014,000, and for CB ranged from $1,021,000-$1,058,000 with CB intervention cost ($8,000-$45,000). At $15,000 cost, CB was borderline cost-effective (ICER = $105,000/QALY). In one-way sensitivity analysis, CB cost and efficacy were the most influential parameters on CB ICER. CB intervention was cost-effective at costs<$15,000 and efficacies ≥2.0. Five-year healthcare payer projected budgetary outlays at a $15,000 CB cost were $3.847B. A modestly effective intervention designed to improve adaptive behavior in autism can be cost-effective under certain circumstances. Intervention cost and efficacy most affected the cost-effectiveness results and should be targeted to increase economic efficiency.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Competing Interests: J.K. has a patent 62470431 pending. J.T. reports consulting fees and honoraria from The EMMES Corporation, AegisCN, Gamida Cell, Navitas Clinical Research, and Synthetic Biologics; patent 16493754; patents pending 62470431, 17170373, 2020554275, 11202009805P, and 1020197029841; and royalties from SinoCell and CryoCell. J.T. also reports that he and Duke University have licensed intellectual property related to this work to CryoCell and that, in accordance with Duke University policies and procedures, both Duke and J.T. may benefit financially if the therapies discussed in this work prove effective and are commercially successful. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0282906