Lower well‐being of young Australian adults with self‐reported disability reflects their poorer living conditions rather than health issues
To determine the extent to which the lower well‐being of young Australians with disabilities could be accounted for by increased rates of exposure to adversity and reduced access to personal, economic, social and community resources. Secondary analysis of data extracted from Waves 1 (2001) to 8 (200...
Saved in:
Published in | Australian and New Zealand journal of public health Vol. 36; no. 2; pp. 176 - 182 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Elsevier B.V
01.04.2012
Blackwell Publishing Ltd Elsevier Limited Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To determine the extent to which the lower well‐being of young Australians with disabilities could be accounted for by increased rates of exposure to adversity and reduced access to personal, economic, social and community resources.
Secondary analysis of data extracted from Waves 1 (2001) to 8 (2008) of the annual longitudinal survey of Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia.
Self‐reported disability was associated with significantly lower scores on all indicators of psychological well‐being. However, people self‐reporting disability were more likely to be exposed to adversity and less likely to have access to a range of personal, economic, material, social and community resources. When these between‐group differences in social context were controlled for, the between‐group differences in psychological well‐being were largely eliminated.
Our results suggest that, among younger adults in Australia, the association between disability and lower psychological well‐being largely reflects their increased risk of exposure to adversity and reduced access to resources, rather than the presence of health conditions or impairments per se.
Public health interventions aimed at improving the well‐being of young adults with a disability need to address the predominantly social determinants of well‐being in this group. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-TVQB5SKV-H istex:0B0DD5A4C3D9A4C5FDD531D0271E3B62B4B0B6E0 ArticleID:AZPH810 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1326-0200 1753-6405 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00810.x |