The efficacy of different preprocessing steps in reducing motion-related confounds in diffusion MRI connectomics

• Published in: NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Vol. 222; p. 117252
• Main Authors: Oldham, Stuart, Arnatkevic̆iūtė, Aurina, Smith, Robert E., Tiego, Jeggan, Bellgrove, Mark A., Fornito, Alex
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 15.11.2020; Elsevier Limited; Elsevier
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Algorithms; Anisotropy; Brain - physiology; Connectome - methods; Contamination; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; dMRI; DTI; DWI; Female; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Head - physiology; Humans; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Male; Motion; Neural networks; Neuroimaging; Neuroimaging - methods; Noise; Software packages; Structural connectivity; Young Adult; Motion; Structural connectivity; Noise; DWI; DTI; FA; dMRI
• ISSN: 1053-8119; 1095-9572; 1095-9572
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117252

•We assess how motion affects structural connectivity in 240 preprocessing pipelines.•Motion contamination of structural connectivity depends on preprocessing choices.•Advanced motion correction tools reduce motion confounds.•FA edge weighting is more susceptible to motion effects than streamline count. Head motion is a major confounding factor in neuroimaging studies. While numerous studies have investigated how motion impacts estimates of functional connectivity, the effects of motion on structural connectivity measured using diffusion MRI have not received the same level of attention, despite the fact that, like functional MRI, diffusion MRI relies on elaborate preprocessing pipelines that require multiple choices at each step. Here, we report a comprehensive analysis of how these choices influence motion-related contamination of structural connectivity estimates. Using a healthy adult sample (N = 294), we evaluated 240 different preprocessing pipelines, devised using plausible combinations of different choices related to explicit head motion correction, tractography propagation algorithms, track seeding methods, track termination constraints, quantitative metrics derived for each connectome edge, and parcellations. We found that an approach to motion correction that includes outlier replacement and within-slice volume correction led to a dramatic reduction in cross-subject correlations between head motion and structural connectivity strength, and that motion contamination is more severe when quantifying connectivity strength using mean tract fractional anisotropy rather than streamline count. We also show that the choice of preprocessing strategy can significantly influence subsequent inferences about network organization, with the location of network hubs varying considerably depending on the specific preprocessing steps applied. Our findings indicate that the impact of motion on structural connectivity can be successfully mitigated using recent motion-correction algorithms that include outlier replacement and within-slice motion correction.