A decision analysis of long-term lithium treatment and the risk of renal failure

Werneke U, Ott M, Salander Renberg E, Taylor D, Stegmayr B. A decision analysis of long‐term lithium treatment and the risk of renal failure. Objective:  To establish whether lithium or anticonvulsant should be used for maintenance treatment for bipolar affective disorder (BPAD) if the risks of suic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa psychiatrica Scandinavica Vol. 126; no. 3; pp. 186 - 197
Main Authors Werneke, U., Ott, M., Renberg, E. Salander, Taylor, D., Stegmayr, B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2012
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Werneke U, Ott M, Salander Renberg E, Taylor D, Stegmayr B. A decision analysis of long‐term lithium treatment and the risk of renal failure. Objective:  To establish whether lithium or anticonvulsant should be used for maintenance treatment for bipolar affective disorder (BPAD) if the risks of suicide and relapse were traded off against the risk of end‐stage renal disease (ESRD). Method:  Decision analysis based on a systematic literature review with two main decisions: (1) use of lithium or at treatment initiation and (2) the potential discontinuation of lithium in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) after 20 years of lithium treatment. The final endpoint was 30 years of treatment with five outcomes to consider: death from suicide, alive with stable or unstable BPAD, alive with or without ESRD. Results:  At the start of treatment, the model identified lithium as the treatment of choice. The risks of developing CKD or ESRD were not relevant at the starting point. Twenty years into treatment, lithium still remained treatment of choice. If CKD had occurred at this point, stopping lithium would only be an option if the likelihood of progression to ESRD exceeded 41.3% or if anticonvulsants always outperformed lithium regarding relapse prevention. Conclusion:  At the current state of knowledge, lithium initiation and continuation even in the presence of long‐term adverse renal effects should be recommended in most cases.
Bibliography:ArticleID:ACPS1847
istex:DFCB125FCEDDB7C453DAC216D97BCDC416B28451
ark:/67375/WNG-QPV9280P-2
http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/onlineopen#OnlineOpen_Terms
Re‐use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set out at
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set out at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/onlineopen#OnlineOpen_Terms
ISSN:0001-690X
1600-0447
1600-0447
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2012.01847.x