Regulating Positive and Negative Emotions in Daily Life

ABSTRACT The present study examined how people regulate their emotions in daily life and how such regulation is related to their daily affective experience and psychological adjustment. Each day for an average of 3 weeks, participants described how they had regulated their emotions in terms of the r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of personality Vol. 76; no. 3; pp. 561 - 580
Main Authors Nezlek, John B., Kuppens, Peter
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.06.2008
Blackwell
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT The present study examined how people regulate their emotions in daily life and how such regulation is related to their daily affective experience and psychological adjustment. Each day for an average of 3 weeks, participants described how they had regulated their emotions in terms of the reappraisal and suppression (inhibiting the expression) of positive and negative emotions, and they described their emotional experience, self‐esteem, and psychological adjustment in terms of Beck's triadic model of depression. Reappraisal was used more often than suppression, and suppressing positive emotions was used less than the other three strategies. In general, regulation through reappraisal was found to be beneficial, whereas regulation by suppression was not. Reappraisal of positive emotions was associated with increases in positive affect, self‐esteem, and psychological adjustment, whereas suppressing positive emotions was associated with decreased positive emotion, self‐esteem, and psychological adjustment, and increased negative emotions. Moreover, relationships between reappraisal and psychological adjustment and self‐esteem were mediated by experienced positive affect, whereas relationships between suppression of positive emotions and self‐esteem adjustment were mediated by negative affect.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-GRSJLD5B-T
istex:8E434ADB54C0BF043F1E8251A464DEFBF88D0290
ArticleID:JOPY496
Preparation of this paper was supported by KULeuven Research Council Grants GOA/05/04 and F/05/047 and by a Faculty Research Grant from the College of William and Mary. The second author is a postdoctoral fellow of the Fund for Scientific Research‐Flanders.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0022-3506
1467-6494
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00496.x