Camus y Sartre, ¿disputa o  afinidad filosófica? Concepciones en torno a la idea de responsabilidad existencial

This essay is based on the question: how to represent the argumentative contrast of the concept of responsibility in the philosophical postulates from Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus?The main objective of this study is to link the way in which bothauthors address, agree, and differ on various phil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRepertorio americano no. 34; pp. 1 - 13
Main Author Ramírez Agüero, Byron
Format Journal Article
LanguageSpanish
Published Heredia Universidad de Costa Rica 11.06.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This essay is based on the question: how to represent the argumentative contrast of the concept of responsibility in the philosophical postulates from Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus?The main objective of this study is to link the way in which bothauthors address, agree, and differ on various philosophical pointsof view about this idea (individual and social human responsibility) throughout their works, and to compare this contrast tothe disputes they have during their life, looking for establishconnections and differences between both philosophical positions (Existentialism and Absurdism), as well as to approach to the foundations of their ideas. This study is based on Sartre byhimself (1955) and The Existentialism is a Humanism (1946),by Sartre, and The Myth of Sisyphus (1942) and The Revel Man (1951) by Camus. El presente artículo se basa en la interrogante: ¿Cómo se presenta el contraste argumentativo del concepto de responsabilidad en los postulados filosóficos de Jean-Paul Sartre y de Albert Camus? El objetivo principal de este estudio es relacionar la forma en la que ambos autores abordan, coinciden y difieren en diversos puntos filosóficos con respecto al tratamiento de esta idea (la responsabilidad humana individual y social) a lo largo de sus obras, y vincular este contraste con las disputas que tuvieron entre sí ambos escritores en vida. Se busca establecer conexiones y diferencias entre ambas posturas filosóficas (existencialismo y absurdismo) y acercarse a las bases de sus ideas. Dicho estudio se basa en Sartre por sí mismo (1955) y El existencialismo es un humanismo (1946) -entre otras obras de Sartre (y sus comentadores)- y El mito de Sísifo (1942) y El hombre rebelde (1951) -entreotras obras de Camus (y sus comentadores)-
ISSN:0252-8479
2215-6143
DOI:10.15359/ra.1-34.1