Comparison of Staff-Assisted Home Hemodialysis with In-Center Hemodialysis and In-Hospital Hemodialysis

• Published in: Hemodialysis international Vol. 6; no. 1; p. 58
• Main Authors: Agraharkar, Mahendra, Du, Yong, Ahuja, Tejinder, Barclay, Cynthia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Canada 01.01.2002
• Subjects: staff-assisted home hemodialysis; In-center hemodialysis; dialysis adequacy; in-hospital hemodialysis
• ISSN: 1542-4758
• DOI: 10.1002/hdi.2002.6.1.58

Home hemodialysis (HHD) is superior to in-center hemodialysis (ICHD) in terms of survival, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. However, assistance from family members in performing HHD is not always available to patients, and professional assistance for HHD can be cost prohibitive. For certain patients, ICHD can be impractical due to difficulties in transportation, which may necessitate ambulance transportation or hospitalization for in-hospital hemodialysis (IHHD). We describe 4 patients that have had problems receiving ICHD for various reasons. Two of these patients had problems with transportation, while the other two could not remain on dialysis for the prescribed duration of time and, therefore, received inadequate dialysis. These patients had difficulty while receiving ICHD in meeting the adequacy criteria set by Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative. One of these patients had a neuropsychiatric disorder and displayed disruptive behavior. When these 4 patients were switched to staff-assisted home hemodialysis (SAHD), the dialysis core indicators improved compared with ICHD, and the patients needed significantly fewer hospitalization days. In this paper, we demonstrate that, in patients that cannot be easily transferred, and in patients with neuropsychiatric disorders, SAHD can be a less expensive and more efficacious modality of dialysis.