Employment impacts of CDM projects in China's power sector

There are continuous debates around the question of whether CDM really contributes to sustainable development (SD) in host countries. Employment impact is an essential indicator of SD. Based on an input-out approach this research builds a quantitative assessment model to evaluate the employment impa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnergy policy Vol. 59; pp. 481 - 491
Main Authors Wang, Can, Zhang, Weishi, Cai, Wenjia, Xie, Xi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.08.2013
Elsevier
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There are continuous debates around the question of whether CDM really contributes to sustainable development (SD) in host countries. Employment impact is an essential indicator of SD. Based on an input-out approach this research builds a quantitative assessment model to evaluate the employment impacts of CDM. Both direct and indirect jobs creation and job losses of CDM projects in the power sector registered by the end of 2011 are calculated by project types and power grids where the project is located. Results of this study show that, although the above mentioned CDM projects causes about 99,000 net direct job losses, they also create about 3.08 million indirect jobs, resulting in the gross employment of CDM to be about 2.98 million. Thereof, hydro projects induce both direct and indirect job losses, which comes to approximately 0.89 million. Solar projects have the most potential since they own the highest indirect jobs created by one GWh generation, about 104 jobs/GWh. •An input–output model was built for assessment of CDM projects' employment impact;•CDM projects create direct and indirect jobs while cause some losses in short.•Significant indirect job gains of CDM projects were found;•Solar projects cause 104 jobs/GWh in average, ranking as the highest contributor.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.010
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0301-4215
1873-6777
DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.010