AKT methylation by SETDB1 promotes AKT kinase activity and oncogenic functions
Aberrant activation of AKT disturbs the proliferation, survival and metabolic homeostasis of various human cancers. Thus, it is critical to understand the upstream signalling pathways governing AKT activation. Here, we report that AKT undergoes SETDB1-mediated lysine methylation to promote its activ...
Saved in:
Published in | Nature cell biology Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 226 - 237 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
01.02.2019
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Aberrant activation of AKT disturbs the proliferation, survival and metabolic homeostasis of various human cancers. Thus, it is critical to understand the upstream signalling pathways governing AKT activation. Here, we report that AKT undergoes SETDB1-mediated lysine methylation to promote its activation, which is antagonized by the Jumonji-family demethylase KDM4B. Notably, compared with wild-type mice, mice harbouring non-methylated mutant
Akt1
not only exhibited reduced body size but were also less prone to carcinogen-induced skin tumours, in part due to reduced AKT activation. Mechanistically, the interaction of phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate with AKT facilitates its interaction with SETDB1 for subsequent AKT methylation, which in turn sustains AKT phosphorylation. Pathologically, genetic alterations, including
SETDB1
amplification, aberrantly promote AKT methylation to facilitate its activation and oncogenic functions. Thus, AKT methylation is an important step, synergizing with PI3K signalling to control AKT activation. This suggests that targeting SETDB1 signalling could be a potential therapeutic strategy for combatting hyperactive AKT-driven cancers.
Guo et al. identify SETDB1 and KDM4B as the methyltransferase and demethylase, respectively, for AKT. AKT methylation promotes its kinase activity and the subsequent tumorigenesis. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS. J.G. designed and performed most of the experiments with assistance from X.D, B.L., W.G., P.L. W.W., P.P., Y.S. A.T. supervised the study. J.G., N.Z. and J.Z. performed the revision. M.Y. and J.A. performed the mass spectrometry work. J.G. and W.W. wrote the manuscript. All authors commented on the manuscript. |
ISSN: | 1465-7392 1476-4679 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41556-018-0261-6 |