Predicting enrollment performance of investigational centers in phase III multi-center clinical trials

• Published in: Contemporary clinical trials communications Vol. 7; pp. 208 - 216
• Main Authors: van den Bor, Rutger M., Grobbee, Diederick E., Oosterman, Bas J., Vaessen, Petrus W.J., Roes, Kit C.B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01.09.2017; Elsevier
• Subjects: Feasibility studies; Other; Risk-based monitoring; Site performance prediction; Site questionnaires; Trial accrual; Trial recruitment; Risk-based monitoring; Trial accrual; Trial recruitment; Site performance prediction; Feasibility studies; Site questionnaires
• ISSN: 2451-8654; 2451-8654
• DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.07.004

Failure to meet subject recruitment targets in clinical trials continues to be a widespread problem with potentially serious scientific, logistical, financial and ethical consequences. On the operational level, enrollment-related issues may be mitigated by careful site selection and by allocating monitoring or training resources proportionally to the anticipated risk of poor enrollment. Such procedures require estimates of the expected recruitment performance that are sufficiently reliable to allow centers to be sensibly categorized. In this study, we investigate whether information obtained from feasibility questionnaires can potentially be used to predict which centers will and which centers will not meet their enrollment targets by means of multivariable logistic regression analysis. From a large set of 59 candidate predictors, we determined the subset that is optimal for predictive purposes using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regularization. Although the extent to which the results are generalizable remains to be determined, they indicate that the prediction accuracy of the optimal model is only a marginal improvement over the intercept-only model, illustrating the difficulty of prediction in this setting.