Results of a Second-generation Constrained Condylar Prosthesis in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Mean 5.5-Year Follow-up

Background: The application of second-generation constrained condylar knee (CCK) prostheses has not been widely studied. This retrospective study was carried out to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a second-generation CCK prosthesis for complex primary or revision total knee arthro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChinese medical journal Vol. 129; no. 11; pp. 1334 - 1339
Main Authors Ye, Chen-Yi, Xue, De-Ting, Jiang, Shuai, He, Rong-Xin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published China Wolters Kluwer - Medknow Publications 05.06.2016
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
Wolters Kluwer
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: The application of second-generation constrained condylar knee (CCK) prostheses has not been widely studied. This retrospective study was carried out to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a second-generation CCK prosthesis for complex primary or revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: In total, 51 consecutive TKAs (47 patients) were performed between June 2003 and June 2013 using second-generation modular CCK prostheses. The follow-up was conducted at 3~a day, 1% 6'h, and 12~h months postoperatively and later annually. Anteroposterior (AP), lateral, skyline, and long-standing AP radiographs of the affected knees were taken. The Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Score, the Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), the Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), and range of motion (ROM) were also recorded. Heteroscedastic two-tailed Student's t-tests were used to compare the HSS score and the Knee Society score between primary and revision TKAs. A value ofP 〈 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Four knees (two patients) were lost to follow-up, and 47 knees (31 primary TKAs and 16 revision TKAs) had a mean follow-up time of 5,5 years. The mean HSS score improved from 51.1 ±15.0 preoperatively to 85.3 ± 8.4 points at the final follow-up (P 〈 0.05). Similar results were observed in terms of the KSKS and KSFS, which improved from 26.0 ± 13.0 to 80.0 ± 12.2 and from 40.0 ± 15.0 to 85.0± 9.3 points, respectively (P 〈 0.05). No significant difference in the HSS, KSKS, KSFS, or ROM was found between primary and revision TKAs (P 〉 0.05). Two complications were observed in the revision TKA group (one intraoperative distal lemur fracture and one recurrence of infection) while one complication (infection) was observed in the primary TKA group. No prosthesis loosening, joint dislocation, patella problems, tibial fracture, or nerve injury were observed. Radiolucent lines were observed in 4% of the knees without progressive osteolysis. Conclusions: Second-generation modular CCK prostheses are a safe and practical treatment for both primary and revision knees that cannot be balanced. However, further studies focusing on different types of constrained prostheses are required to validate these results.
Bibliography:11-2154/R
Clinical Effectiveness; Constrained Condylar; Total Knee Arthroplasty
Background: The application of second-generation constrained condylar knee (CCK) prostheses has not been widely studied. This retrospective study was carried out to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a second-generation CCK prosthesis for complex primary or revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: In total, 51 consecutive TKAs (47 patients) were performed between June 2003 and June 2013 using second-generation modular CCK prostheses. The follow-up was conducted at 3~a day, 1% 6'h, and 12~h months postoperatively and later annually. Anteroposterior (AP), lateral, skyline, and long-standing AP radiographs of the affected knees were taken. The Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Score, the Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), the Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), and range of motion (ROM) were also recorded. Heteroscedastic two-tailed Student's t-tests were used to compare the HSS score and the Knee Society score between primary and revision TKAs. A value ofP 〈 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Four knees (two patients) were lost to follow-up, and 47 knees (31 primary TKAs and 16 revision TKAs) had a mean follow-up time of 5,5 years. The mean HSS score improved from 51.1 ±15.0 preoperatively to 85.3 ± 8.4 points at the final follow-up (P 〈 0.05). Similar results were observed in terms of the KSKS and KSFS, which improved from 26.0 ± 13.0 to 80.0 ± 12.2 and from 40.0 ± 15.0 to 85.0± 9.3 points, respectively (P 〈 0.05). No significant difference in the HSS, KSKS, KSFS, or ROM was found between primary and revision TKAs (P 〉 0.05). Two complications were observed in the revision TKA group (one intraoperative distal lemur fracture and one recurrence of infection) while one complication (infection) was observed in the primary TKA group. No prosthesis loosening, joint dislocation, patella problems, tibial fracture, or nerve injury were observed. Radiolucent lines were observed in 4% of the knees without progressive osteolysis. Conclusions: Second-generation modular CCK prostheses are a safe and practical treatment for both primary and revision knees that cannot be balanced. However, further studies focusing on different types of constrained prostheses are required to validate these results.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0366-6999
2542-5641
DOI:10.4103/0366-6999.182845