A population genetic assessment of coral recovery on highly disturbed reefs of the Keppel Island archipelago in the southern Great Barrier Reef

• Published in: PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) Vol. 3; p. e1092
• Main Authors: van Oppen, Madeleine J H, Lukoschek, Vimoksalehi, Berkelmans, Ray, Peplow, Lesa M, Jones, Alison M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States PeerJ. Ltd 23.07.2015; PeerJ, Inc; PeerJ Inc
• Subjects: Acropora; Acropora millepora; Acroporidae; Bayesian analysis; Biodiversity; Cnidaria; Coral bleaching; Coral reef management; Coral reefs; Corals; Ecology; Gene flow; Genetic distance; Genetic diversity; Genetic markers; Genetics; Health aspects; Inbreeding; Islands; Marine Biology; Microsatellites; Mortality; Population genetics; Population structure; Rainfall; Recruitment; Reproductive fitness; Scleractinia; Population structure; Gene flow; Genetic diversity; Microsatellites; Coral reef management; Acropora millepora
• ISSN: 2167-8359; 2167-8359
• DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1092

Coral reefs surrounding the islands lying close to the coast are unique to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) in that they are frequently exposed to disturbance events including floods caused by cyclonic rainfall, strong winds and occasional periods of prolonged above-average temperatures during summer. In one such group of islands in the southern GBR, the Keppel Island archipelago, climate-driven disturbances frequently result in major coral mortality. Whilst these island reefs have clearly survived such dramatic disturbances in the past, the consequences of extreme mortality events may include the loss of genetic diversity, and hence adaptive potential, and a reduction in fitness due to inbreeding, especially if new recruitment from external sources is limited. Here we examined the level of isolation of the Keppel Island group as well as patterns of gene flow within the Keppel Islands using 10 microsatellite markers in nine populations of the coral, Acropora millepora. Bayesian cluster analysis and assignment tests indicated gene flow is restricted, but not absent, between the outer and inner Keppel Island groups, and that extensive gene flow exists within each of these island groups. Comparison of the Keppel Island data with results from a previous GBR-wide study that included a single Keppel Island population, confirmed that A. millepora in the Keppel Islands is genetically distinct from populations elsewhere on the GBR, with exception of the nearby inshore High Peak Reef just north of the Keppel Islands. We compared patterns of genetic diversity in the Keppel Island populations with those from other GBR populations and found them to be slightly, but significantly lower, consistent with the archipelago being geographically isolated, but there was no evidence for recent bottlenecks or deviation from mutation-drift equilibrium. A high incidence of private alleles in the Keppel Islands, particularly in the outer islands, supports their relative isolation and contributes to the conservation value of the archipelago. The lack of evidence for genetic erosion, in combination with our observation that the North Keppel Island population samples collected in 2002 and 2008, respectively, exhibited a pairwise genetic distance of zero, supports previous published work indicating that, following bleaching, Acropora corals in the Keppel Islands predominantly recover from regrowth of small amounts of remaining live tissue in apparently dead coral colonies. This is likely supplemented by recruitment of larvae from genetically similar, less disturbed populations at nearby reefs, particularly following extreme flood events.