MHC-II neoantigens shape tumour immunity and response to immunotherapy

The ability of the immune system to eliminate and shape the immunogenicity of tumours defines the process of cancer immunoediting 1 . Immunotherapies such as those that target immune checkpoint molecules can be used to augment immune-mediated elimination of tumours and have resulted in durable respo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature (London) Vol. 574; no. 7780; pp. 696 - 701
Main Authors Alspach, Elise, Lussier, Danielle M., Miceli, Alexander P., Kizhvatov, Ilya, DuPage, Michel, Luoma, Adrienne M., Meng, Wei, Lichti, Cheryl F., Esaulova, Ekaterina, Vomund, Anthony N., Runci, Daniele, Ward, Jeffrey P., Gubin, Matthew M., Medrano, Ruan F. V., Arthur, Cora D., White, J. Michael, Sheehan, Kathleen C. F., Chen, Alex, Wucherpfennig, Kai W., Jacks, Tyler, Unanue, Emil R., Artyomov, Maxim N., Schreiber, Robert D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.10.2019
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The ability of the immune system to eliminate and shape the immunogenicity of tumours defines the process of cancer immunoediting 1 . Immunotherapies such as those that target immune checkpoint molecules can be used to augment immune-mediated elimination of tumours and have resulted in durable responses in patients with cancer that did not respond to previous treatments. However, only a subset of patients benefit from immunotherapy and more knowledge about what is required for successful treatment is needed 2 – 4 . Although the role of tumour neoantigen-specific CD8 + T cells in tumour rejection is well established 5 – 9 , the roles of other subsets of T cells have received less attention. Here we show that spontaneous and immunotherapy-induced anti-tumour responses require the activity of both tumour-antigen-specific CD8 + and CD4 + T cells, even in tumours that do not express major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules. In addition, the expression of MHC class II-restricted antigens by tumour cells is required at the site of successful rejection, indicating that activation of CD4 + T cells must also occur in the tumour microenvironment. These findings suggest that MHC class II-restricted neoantigens have a key function in the anti-tumour response that is nonoverlapping with that of MHC class I-restricted neoantigens and therefore needs to be considered when identifying patients who will most benefit from immunotherapy. In a mouse tumour model, immunotherapy-induced rejection of tumour cells requires presentation of both MHC class I and MHC class II antigens, which activate CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, respectively.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
R.D.S. is a cofounder, scientific advisory board member, stockholder, and royalty recipient of Jounce Therapeutics and Neon Therapeutics and is a scientific advisory board member for A2 Biotherapeutics, BioLegend, Codiak Biosciences, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, NGM Biopharmaceuticals and Sensei Biotherapeutics. K.W.W. serves on the scientific advisory board of Tscan Therapeutics and Nextechinvest and receives sponsored research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Novartis; these activities are not related to the findings described in this publication. T.J. is a member of the Board of Directors of Amgen and Thermo Fisher Scientific. He is also a co-Founder of Dragonfly Therapeutics and T2 Biosystems. T.J. serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of Dragonfly Therapeutics, SQZ Biotech, and Skyhawk Therapeutics. None of these affiliations represent a conflict of interest with respect to the design or execution of this study or interpretation of data presented in this manuscript. Dr. Jacks’s laboratory currently also receives funding from the Johnson & Johnson Lung Cancer Initiative and Calico, but this funding did not support the research described in this manuscript.
Current address: Division of Immunology and Pathogenesis, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
E.A. conceived and designed the experiments, collected the data, performed and interpreted the analyses, and wrote the manuscript. D.M.L and A.P.M planned experiments, and collected and analyzed data. I.K. conceived of and designed the hmMHC algorithm and performed analyses using it, and wrote the methodological description found in this manuscript. M.D. generated the KP9025 sarcoma cell line. A.M.L provided technical assistance and helped plan experiments using MHC class II tetramers. W.M. and C.F.L. planned, performed and analyzed mass spectrometry experiments. E.E. assisted with bioinformatics analyses. A.N.V. assisted with the generation of the CD4+ T cell hybridomas, and helped design and perform experiments using them. D.R. designed, collected, and analyzed data for experiments involving multi-color flow cytometry. J.P.W. provided technical support for MHC class I tetramer staining. M.M.G assisted in experiment planning. R.F.V.M. collected and analyzed data for experiments involving multi-color flow cytometry. C.D.A., K.C.F.S. and J.M.W. provided technical assistance throughout the study. A.C. collected data. K.W.W. provided mITGB1-MHC class II monomers and provided assistance in experimental design. T.J. provided support in experimental design and data analysis regarding the KP9025 sarcoma line. M.N.A. conceived and designed the hmMHC algorithm and provided bioinformatics support. E.R.U. provided assistance in experimental design. R.D.S. conceived experiments, interpreted data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision.
ISSN:0028-0836
1476-4687
DOI:10.1038/s41586-019-1671-8