Improving plant functional groups for dynamic models of biodiversity: at the crossroads between functional and community ecology

The pace of on‐going climate change calls for reliable plant biodiversity scenarios. Traditional dynamic vegetation models use plant functional types that are summarized to such an extent that they become meaningless for biodiversity scenarios. Hybrid dynamic vegetation models of intermediate comple...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGlobal change biology Vol. 18; no. 11; pp. 3464 - 3475
Main Authors Boulangeat, Isabelle, Philippe, Pauline, Abdulhak, Sylvain, Douzet, Roland, Garraud, Luc, Lavergne, Sébastien, Lavorel, Sandra, Van Es, Jérémie, Vittoz, Pascal, Thuiller, Wilfried
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2012
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The pace of on‐going climate change calls for reliable plant biodiversity scenarios. Traditional dynamic vegetation models use plant functional types that are summarized to such an extent that they become meaningless for biodiversity scenarios. Hybrid dynamic vegetation models of intermediate complexity (hybrid‐DVMs) have recently been developed to address this issue. These models, at the crossroads between phenomenological and process‐based models, are able to involve an intermediate number of well‐chosen plant functional groups (PFGs). The challenge is to build meaningful PFGs that are representative of plant biodiversity, and consistent with the parameters and processes of hybrid‐DVMs. Here, we propose and test a framework based on few selected traits to define a limited number of PFGs, which are both representative of the diversity (functional and taxonomic) of the flora in the Ecrins National Park, and adapted to hybrid‐DVMs. This new classification scheme, together with recent advances in vegetation modeling, constitutes a step forward for mechanistic biodiversity modeling.
Bibliography:Figure S1. Evaluation of the optimal number of groups. Figure S2. Effect of removing outlier species. Table S1. Species in each group. Table S2. The resulting PFGs and their classification trait values. Table S3. BIOCLIM description of variables. Table S4. Databases used for species traits or characteristics. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer-reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
ArticleID:GCB2783
ark:/67375/WNG-CGF6XGGX-8
istex:07678EE2AF9EBF05A396D5BC2FDB2952846A315D
Agence Nationale de la Recherche - No. ANR-08-PEXT-03
European Research Council - No. FP7/2007-2013; No. 281422
ISSN:1354-1013
1365-2486
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02783.x