Grazer cues induce stealth behavior in marine dinoflagellates
Chain formation is common among phytoplankton organisms but the underlying reasons and consequences are poorly understood. Here we show that chain formation is strongly impaired by waterborne cues from copepod grazers in the dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense. Chains of Alexandrium cells exposed t...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 108; no. 10; pp. 4030 - 4034 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
08.03.2011
National Acad Sciences |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Chain formation is common among phytoplankton organisms but the underlying reasons and consequences are poorly understood. Here we show that chain formation is strongly impaired by waterborne cues from copepod grazers in the dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense. Chains of Alexandrium cells exposed to copepod cues responded by splitting into single cells or shorter chains. Motion analysis revealed significantly lower swimming velocities for single cells compared with chains, with two-to fivefold higher simulated predator encounter rates for two-and four-cell chains, respectively. In addition, the few remaining two-cell chains in grazed treatments were swimming at approximately half the speed of two-cell chains in treatments without grazers, which reduced encounter rates with grazers to values similar to that of single cells. Chain length plasticity and swimming behavior constitute unique mechanisms to reduce encounters with grazers. We argue that dinoflagellates can regulate the balance between motil ity and predator avoidance by adjusting chain length. The high predator encounter rate for motile chains may have contributed to the low prevalence of chain formation in motile phytoplankton compared with in nonmotile phytoplankton where chain formation is more common. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Edited by Sallie W. Chisholm, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, and approved January 24, 2011 (received for review September 5, 2010) Author contributions: E.S., H.H.J., and T.K. designed research; E.S. and H.H.J. performed research; F.L. and T.K. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; E.S., H.H.J., F.L., and T.K. analyzed data; and E.S., H.H.J., F.L., and T.K. wrote the paper. |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1011870108 |