Sexual partners, sexually transmitted infections, and prostate cancer risk

•Association between sexual activity and prostate cancer risk was examined.•Having had >20 female sexual partners associated with decreased prostate cancer risk.•Having had >20 male sexual partners were suggestive of greater prostate cancer risk.•Self-identification as a homosexual was suggest...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer epidemiology Vol. 38; no. 6; pp. 700 - 707
Main Authors Spence, Andrea R., Rousseau, Marie-Claude, Parent, Marie-Élise
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2014
Elsevier Limited
American Association for Cancer Research
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Association between sexual activity and prostate cancer risk was examined.•Having had >20 female sexual partners associated with decreased prostate cancer risk.•Having had >20 male sexual partners were suggestive of greater prostate cancer risk.•Self-identification as a homosexual was suggestive of greater prostate cancer risk.•No association found between sexually transmitted infections and prostate cancer. Background: The etiology of prostate cancer (PCa) is poorly understood. Sexual activity and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are among factors under scrutiny, with controversial findings to date. Methods: We examined the association between the number and gender of sexual partners, STIs and PCa risk in the context of PROtEuS, a population-based case–control study set amongst the mainly French-speaking population in Montreal, Canada. The study included 1590 histologically-confirmed PCa cases diagnosed in a Montreal French hospital between 2005 and 2009, and 1618 population controls ascertained from the French electoral list, Montreal residents, frequency-matched to cases by age. In-person interviews elicited information on sociodemographic, lifestyle and environmental factors. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between sexually related factors and PCa risk, adjusting for age, ancestry, family history of PCa, and PCa screening history. Results: Subjects with more than 20 sexual partners in their lifetime had a decreased risk of PCa (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61–1.00) as did subjects who specifically had more than 20 female sexual partners (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56–0.94). By contrast, having had several male sexual partners appeared to confer some excess in risk of PCa. No association emerged for history of STIs and PCa but STIs prevalence was low. Conclusion: Our findings are in support of a role for the number of sexual partners in PCa development. The gender of sexual partners should be taken into account in future studies investigating this association.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1877-7821
1877-783X
1055-9965
1877-783X
1538-7755
DOI:10.1016/j.canep.2014.09.005