Esophagectomy for T1 Esophageal Cancer: Outcomes in 100 Patients and Implications for Endoscopic Therapy

• Published in: The Annals of thoracic surgery Vol. 87; no. 4; pp. 1048 - 1055
• Main Authors: Pennathur, Arjun, MD, Farkas, Andrew, BA, Krasinskas, Alyssa M., MD, Ferson, Peter F., MD, Gooding, William E., MS, Gibson, Michael K., MD, Schuchert, Matthew J., MD, Landreneau, Rodney J., MD, Luketich, James D., MD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01.04.2009
• Subjects: Adenocarcinoma - pathology; Adenocarcinoma - surgery; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery; Cardiothoracic Surgery; Endoscopy; Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery; Esophagectomy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Surgery; 7
• ISSN: 0003-4975; 1552-6259
• DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.12.060

Objectives Esophagectomy is the standard treatment for T1 esophageal cancer (EC). Interest in endoscopic therapies, particularly for T1 EC, is increasing. We evaluated the long-term outcomes after esophagectomy and examined the pathologic features of T1 cancer to determine the suitability for potential endoscopic therapy. Methods We reviewed the outcomes of esophagectomy in 100 consecutive patients with T1 EC. The primary end points studied were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). In addition to detailed pathology review, we evaluated prognostic variables associated with survival. Results Esophagectomy was performed in 100 patients (79 men, 21 women; median age, 68 years) for T1 EC, comprising adenocarcinoma, 91; squamous, 9; intramucosal (T1a), 29; and submucosal (T1b), 71. The 30-day mortality was 0%. Resection margins were microscopically negative in 99 patients (99%). N1 disease was present in 21 (T1a, 2 of 29 [7%]; T1b, 19 of 71 [27%]), associated high-grade dysplasia in 64 (64%), and angiolymphatic invasion in 19 (19%). At a median follow-up of 66 months, estimated 5-year OS was 62% and 3-year DFS was 80% for all patients (including N1). Nodal status and tumor size were significantly associated with OS and DFS, respectively. Conclusions Esophagectomy can be performed safely in patients with T1 EC with good long-term results. Many patients with T1 EC have several risk factors that may preclude adequate treatment with endoscopic therapy. Further prospective studies are required to evaluate endoscopic therapies. Esophagectomy should continue to remain the standard treatment in patients with T1 EC.