The effects of changes in the environment on the spatial firing of hippocampal complex-spike cells

• Published in: The Journal of neuroscience Vol. 7; no. 7; pp. 1951 - 1968
• Main Authors: Muller, RU, Kubie, JL
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Washington, DC Soc Neuroscience 01.07.1987; Society for Neuroscience
• Subjects: Action Potentials; Animals; Biological and medical sciences; Central nervous system; Computer Systems; Cues; Electrophysiology; Environment; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Hippocampus - cytology; Hippocampus - physiology; Neurons - classification; Neurons - physiology; Orientation - physiology; Rats; Television; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs; Neurosis; Vertebrata; Mammalia; Rat; Rodentia; Central nervous system; Computerized processing; Electrophysiology; Brain (Vertebrata); Hippocampus; Rhinencephalon
• ISSN: 0270-6474; 1529-2401
• DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.07-07-01951.1987

Using the techniques set out in the preceding paper (Muller et al., 1987), we investigated the response of place cells to changes in the animal's environment. The standard apparatus used was a cylinder, 76 cm in diameter, with walls 51 cm high. The interior was uniformly gray except for a white cue card that ran the full height of the wall and occupied 100 degrees of arc. The floor of the apparatus presented no obstacles to the animal's motions. Each of these major features of the apparatus was varied while the others were held constant. One set of manipulations involved the cue card. Rotating the cue card produced equal rotations of the firing fields of single cells. Changing the width of the card did not affect the size, shape, or radial position of firing fields, although sometimes the field rotated to a modest extent. Removing the cue card altogether also left the size, shape, and radial positions of firing fields unchanged, but caused fields to rotate to unpredictable angular positions. The second set of manipulations dealt with the size and shape of the apparatus wall. When the standard (small) cylinder was scaled up in diameter and height by a factor of 2, the firing fields of 36% of the cells observed in both cylinders also scaled, in the sense that the field stayed at the same angular position and at the same relative radial position. Of the cells recorded in both cylinders, 52% showed very different firing patterns in one cylinder than in the other. The remaining 12% of the cells were virtually silent in both cylinders. Similar results were obtained when individual cells were recorded in both a small and a large rectangular enclosure. By contrast, when the apparatus floor plan was changed from circular to rectangular, the firing pattern of a cell in an apparatus of one shape could not be predicted from a knowledge of the firing pattern in the other shape. The final manipulations involved placing vertical barriers into the otherwise unobstructed floor of the small cylinder. When an opaque barrier was set up to bisect a previously recorded firing field, in almost all cases the firing field was nearly abolished. This was true even though the barrier occupied only a small fraction of the firing field area. A transparent barrier was effective as the opaque barrier in attenuating firing fields. The lead base used to anchor the vertical barriers did not affect place cell firing.