Asking the Right Questions: Examining the Efficacy of Question Trails as a Method of Improving Lay Comprehension and Application of Legal Concepts

The present study examines the 'fact based' approach to jury instructions, which embeds legal concepts in a series of logically ordered written factual questions that the jury must answer to reach a verdict. The study utilised a sample of 1007 adults called for jury service in Victoria, Au...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychiatry, psychology, and law Vol. 26; no. 3; pp. 441 - 456
Main Authors Spivak, Benjamin, Ogloff, James R. P., Clough, Jonathan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Routledge 01.06.2019
Australian Academic Press Group Pty Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The present study examines the 'fact based' approach to jury instructions, which embeds legal concepts in a series of logically ordered written factual questions that the jury must answer to reach a verdict. The study utilised a sample of 1007 adults called for jury service in Victoria, Australia. Four instructional types (standard, plain language, checklist, fact based) were compared on paraphrase and application measures across three time points. Results indicated that paraphrase performance was significantly lower for standard instructions compared to all other instructional types at the pre-deliberation stage. Findings around application of law were mixed. At the pre-deliberation stage, participants receiving fact based instructions had significantly higher scores on true/false application questions compared with participants in other conditions, whereas there were no significant differences between conditions for multiple-choice application. However, testing following deliberation revealed that participants in the fact-based condition had significantly higher scores on multiple-choice application items.
Bibliography:PSYCHIATRY, PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW, Vol. 26, No. 3, Jun 2019, [441]-456
Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1321-8719
1934-1687
DOI:10.1080/13218719.2018.1506720