Evaluation of a short glass fibre-reinforced tube as a model for cat femur for biomechanical testing of orthopaedic implants

• Published in: Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology Vol. 21; no. 3; p. 195
• Main Authors: Gibson, T W G, Moens, N M M, Runciman, R J, Holmberg, D L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany 01.01.2008
• Subjects: Animals; Biomechanical Phenomena; Bone Screws - veterinary; Cadaver; Cats - injuries; Compressive Strength; Equipment Design; Femoral Fractures - surgery; Femoral Fractures - veterinary; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods; Fracture Fixation, Internal - veterinary; Internal Fixators - standards; Internal Fixators - veterinary; Materials Testing - methods; Materials Testing - standards; Materials Testing - veterinary; Stress, Mechanical; Tensile Strength
• ISSN: 0932-0814
• DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1617361

The biomechanical testing of tubes made of third generation short glass fibre-reinforced (SGFR) material approximating cat femurs was performed in order to determine their suitability as cat femur surrogates for the biomechanical testing of orthopaedic implants. The tubes were tested in compression, three-point bending, notch testing, and screw pullout. Thin walled (B1-tubes) had a 13% lower maximum load to failure, a 19% higher maximum strength and a 13% lower elastic modulus compared to cat femurs tested in compression. B1-tubes maximum load to failure in three-point bending and screw pullout strength were considerably lower compared to cat femurs (29% and 63%, respectively). Notch testing was not performed on B1-tubes due to low bending strength. Thicker walled (B2-tubes) had a 23% higher maximum load to failure, a 10% higher maximum strength and a 21% lower elastic modulus compared to cat femurs tested in compression. The comparison of B2-tubes and cat femurs in three-point bending revealed a 7% increase in maximum load to failure for the B2-tubes. Drilled B2-tubes (notch testing) were weaker with a 30% lower load to failure compared to cat femurs. A screw pullout comparison of B2-tubes and cat femurs revealed a 2% increase in maximum load to failure for the B2-tubes. These tubes were intended to provide a model as a suitable surrogate for cat femurs for testing the bending strength of various orthopaedic constructs involving plates and screws. Testing revealed that third generation SGFR tubes were not suitable for these purposes and emphasizes the need to carefully evaluate the suitability of any model.