The ability of artisanal fishers to recognize the dolphins they cooperate with

• Published in: Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine Vol. 16; no. 1; p. 30
• Main Authors: da Rosa, Daiane S X, Hanazaki, Natalia, Cantor, Maurício, Simões-Lopes, Paulo C, Daura-Jorge, Fábio G
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 29.05.2020; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analysis; Animal behavior; Animal populations; Animals; Behavior, Animal; Brazil; Cetacea; Consensus; Cooperation; Dolphins; Dolphins & porpoises; Dolphins (Mammals); Ecology; Ethnoecology; Ethnography; Fins; Fisheries; Fishers’ perceptions; Foraging behavior; Human-Animal Interaction; Humans; Individual recognition; Interaction; Interviews; Knowledge; Male; Marine mammals; Middle Aged; Native peoples; Perceptions; Recognition, Psychology; Traditional knowledge; Young Adult; Brazil; Cetacean; Fishers’ perceptions; Individual recognition; Interaction; Traditional knowledge; Ethnoecology; Consensus
• ISSN: 1746-4269; 1746-4269
• DOI: 10.1186/s13002-020-00383-3

Human-animal interactions with mutual benefits in the wild are rare. Such positive interactions seem to require an intricate knowledge from the human side on the animals' behavior and their habitat. In southern Brazil, dolphins and human net-casting fishers have specialized in a cooperative foraging, in which fishers report being able to identify and name dolphins. Here, we evaluate the consensus in their ability to recognize the individual dolphins they interact with. By investigating the reliability of this recognition process, we assess the pros and cons of relying on the fishers' traditional knowledge to further understand the behavior and ecology of dolphins at the individual level. We also assess the potential role of traditional knowledge for the maintenance of this unusual interaction. We interviewed 38 fishers using a semi-structured questionnaire. During each interview, we evaluate their recognition ability of dolphins by showing high-quality photos of dorsal fins of different dolphins, asking questions about the dolphins' behavior and traits, and about how fishers recognize each dolphin. We also evaluated information about the fishers. Different indices were used to measure the fishers' ability to recognize dolphins via photos, and their consensus on individual identification. These indices were modeled as functions of traits of both dolphins and fishers to investigate which ones influence the recognition process. We found that fishers can primarily recognize dolphins by natural marks in the dorsal fin but there was little consensus in recognition. Fishers also tend to repeat the name of the most "popular" dolphins for different photos, indicating low reliability in individual recognition. We also found that fishers who learned from relatives (vertical learning) how to interact with dolphins tend to be more accurate and have higher consensus in dolphin recognition than those fishers who learned from friends (horizontal learning) or individually. Artisanal fishers have a deep understanding of the dolphins and the system they are inserted in. However, the lack of consensus in identifying individual dolphins herein reported indicates that using their traditional knowledge to further understand dolphin behavior and ecology at the individual level requires caution. Our study also suggests that the transmission of this tradition from parents to sons can be crucial to preserve such a unique human-animal positive interaction in its original form.