Comparative Analysis of DNA-Binding Selectivity of Hairpin and Cyclic Pyrrole-Imidazole Polyamides Based on Next-Generation Sequencing

Many long pyrrole‐imidazole polyamides (PIPs) have been synthesized in the search for higher specificity, with the aim of realizing the great potential of such compounds in biological and clinical areas. Among several types of PIPs, we designed and synthesized hairpin and cyclic PIPs targeting ident...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology Vol. 17; no. 18; pp. 1752 - 1758
Main Authors Kashiwazaki, Gengo, Chandran, Anandhakumar, Asamitsu, Sefan, Kawase, Takashi, Kawamoto, Yusuke, Sawatani, Yoshito, Hashiya, Kaori, Bando, Toshikazu, Sugiyama, Hiroshi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published WEINHEIM Blackwell Publishing Ltd 15.09.2016
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Many long pyrrole‐imidazole polyamides (PIPs) have been synthesized in the search for higher specificity, with the aim of realizing the great potential of such compounds in biological and clinical areas. Among several types of PIPs, we designed and synthesized hairpin and cyclic PIPs targeting identical sequences. Bind‐n‐Seq analysis revealed that both bound to the intended sequences. However, adenines in the data analyzed by the previously reported Bind‐n‐Seq method appeared to be significantly higher in the motif ratio than thymines, even though the PIPs were not expected to distinguish A from T. We therefore examined the experimental protocol and analysis pipeline in detail and developed a new method based on Bind‐n‐Seq motif identification with a reference sequence (Bind‐n‐Seq‐MR). High‐throughput sequence analysis of the PIP‐enriched DNA data by Bind‐n‐Seq‐MR presented A and T comparably. Surface plasmon resonance assays were performed to validate the new method. Hairpin and cyclic N‐methylpyrrole‐N‐methylimidazole polyamides (PIPs) with biotin were synthesized, and their binding specificities against randomized DNA sequences were evaluated with next‐generation sequencing. Both PIP types recognized DNA sequences by base‐pairing rules. We propose a Bind‐n‐Seq method that is particularly relevant for analyzing PIP binding.
Bibliography:istex:963237B01302CD39E07D3D449BC3433C4FB4B314
ark:/67375/WNG-CZX8M9QJ-X
ArticleID:CBIC201600282
These authors contributed equally to this work.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1439-4227
1439-7633
DOI:10.1002/cbic.201600282