Meta-analysis and review of functional neuroimaging differences underlying adolescent vulnerability to substance use

Adolescence is increasingly viewed as a sensitive period in the development of substance use disorders (SUDs). Neurodevelopmental ‘dual-risk’ theories suggest adolescent vulnerability to problematic substance use is driven by an overactive reward drive mediated by the striatum, and poor cognitive co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Vol. 209; p. 116476
Main Authors Tervo-Clemmens, Brenden, Quach, Alina, Calabro, Finnegan J., Foran, William, Luna, Beatriz
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.04.2020
Elsevier Limited
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Adolescence is increasingly viewed as a sensitive period in the development of substance use disorders (SUDs). Neurodevelopmental ‘dual-risk’ theories suggest adolescent vulnerability to problematic substance use is driven by an overactive reward drive mediated by the striatum, and poor cognitive control mediated by the prefrontal cortex. To this end, there has been a growing number of neuroimaging studies examining cognitive and affective neural systems during adolescence for markers of vulnerability to problematic substance use. Here, we perform a coordinate-based meta-analysis on this emerging literature. Twenty-two task-based voxelwise fMRI studies with activation differences associated with substance use vulnerability, representative of approximately 1092 subjects, were identified through a systematic literature search (PubMed, Scopus) and coordinates of activation differences (N ​= ​190) were extracted. Adolescents were defined as ‘at-risk’ for problematic substance use based on a family history of SUD or through prospective prediction of substance use initiation or escalation. Multilevel kernel density analysis was used to identify the most consistent brain regions associated with adolescent substance use vulnerability. Across the included studies, substance use vulnerability was most reliably associated with activation differences in the striatum, where at-risk adolescents had hyper-activation in the dorsal subdivision (putamen). Follow-up analyses suggested striatal differences were driven by tasks sharing a motivational and/or reward component (e.g., monetary incentive) and common across subgroups of substance use risk (family history and prospective prediction studies). Analyses examining the role of psychiatric comorbidity revealed striatal activation differences were significantly more common in samples whose definition of substance use risk included cooccurring externalizing psychopathology. Furthermore, substance use risk meta-analytic results were no longer significant when excluding these studies, although this may reflect limitations in statistical power. No significant activation differences were observed in prefrontal cortex in any analysis. These results suggest striatal dysfunction, rather than prefrontal, may be a more primary neural feature of adolescent vulnerability to problematic substance use, possibly through a dimension of individual variability shared with externalizing psychopathology. However, our systematic literature search confirms this is still an emerging field. More studies, increased data sharing, and further quantitative integration are necessary for a comprehensive understanding of the neuroimaging markers of adolescent substance use risk. •Systematic literature search of fMRI studies of youth at risk for substance use disorders.•Coordinates of activation differences were integrated from twenty-two studies.•Substance use risk was most associated with activation differences in the striatum.•Striatal differences were more common in studies including externalizing disorders.•Larger studies and increased data sharing are necessary.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Author contribution statement
Brenden Tervo-Clemmens: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Data Analysis, Writing-Original draft preparation, Alina Quach: Data Curation, Finnegan J. Calabro: Conceptualization, Writing – reviewing & editing, William Foran: Data Curation, Beatriz Luna: Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding Acquisition, Writing – reviewing & editing
ISSN:1053-8119
1095-9572
1095-9572
DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116476