Rapid computation of TMS-induced E-fields using a dipole-based magnetic stimulation profile approach

TMS neuronavigation with on-line display of the induced electric field (E-field) has the potential to improve quantitative targeting and dosing of stimulation, but present commercially available solutions are limited by simplified approximations. Developing a near real-time method for accurate appro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Vol. 237; p. 118097
Main Authors Daneshzand, Mohammad, Makarov, Sergey N., de Lara, Lucia I. Navarro, Guerin, Bastien, McNab, Jennifer, Rosen, Bruce R., Hämäläinen, Matti S., Raij, Tommi, Nummenmaa, Aapo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 15.08.2021
Elsevier Limited
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:TMS neuronavigation with on-line display of the induced electric field (E-field) has the potential to improve quantitative targeting and dosing of stimulation, but present commercially available solutions are limited by simplified approximations. Developing a near real-time method for accurate approximation of TMS induced E-fields with subject-specific high-resolution surface-based head models that can be utilized for TMS navigation. Magnetic dipoles are placed on a closed surface enclosing an MRI-based head model of the subject to define a set of basis functions for the incident and total E-fields that define the subject's Magnetic Stimulation Profile (MSP). The near real-time speed is achieved by recognizing that the total E-field of the coil only depends on the incident E-field and the conductivity boundary geometry. The total E-field for any coil position can be obtained by matching the incident field of the stationary dipole basis set with the incident E-field of the moving coil and applying the same basis coefficients to the total E-field basis functions. Comparison of the MSP-based approximation with an established TMS solver shows great agreement in the E-field amplitude (relative maximum error around 5%) and the spatial distribution patterns (correlation >98%). Computation of the E-field took ~100 ms on a cortical surface mesh with 120k facets. The numerical accuracy and speed of the MSP approximation method make it well suited for a wide range of computational tasks including interactive planning, targeting, dosing, and visualization of the intracranial E-fields for near real-time guidance of coil positioning.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Lucia I. Navarro de Lara: Resources, Validation and Writing-Review and Editing.
Bruce R. Rosen: Writing-Review and Editing.
Bastien Guerin: Formal analysis and Writing-Review and Editing.
Tommi Raij: Writing-Review and Editing.
Authors contributions
Sergey N. Makarov: Software, Investigation and Writing-Review and Editing.
Mohammad Daneshzand: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation and Writing-Original Draft.
Jennifer McNab: Writing-Review and Editing.
Matti S. Hämäläinen: Writing-Review and Editing.
Aapo Nummenmaa: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Resources, Supervision, Writing-Review and Editing. Project administration and Funding acquisition.
ISSN:1053-8119
1095-9572
1095-9572
DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118097