Frontoparietal pattern similarity analyses of cognitive control in monozygotic twins

The ability to flexibly adapt thoughts and actions in a goal-directed manner appears to rely on cognitive control mechanisms that are strongly impacted by individual differences. A powerful research strategy for investigating the nature of individual variation is to study monozygotic (identical) twi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Vol. 241; p. 118415
Main Authors Tang, Rongxiang, Etzel, Joset A., Kizhner, Alexander, Braver, Todd S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2021
Elsevier Limited
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1053-8119
1095-9572
1095-9572
DOI10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118415

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The ability to flexibly adapt thoughts and actions in a goal-directed manner appears to rely on cognitive control mechanisms that are strongly impacted by individual differences. A powerful research strategy for investigating the nature of individual variation is to study monozygotic (identical) twins. Evidence of twin effects have been observed in prior behavioral and neuroimaging studies, yet within the domain of cognitive control, it remains to be demonstrated that the neural underpinnings of such effects are specific and reliable. Here, we utilize a multi-task, within-subjects event-related neuroimaging design with functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate twin effects through multivariate pattern similarity analyses. We focus on fronto-parietal brain regions exhibiting consistently increased activation associated with cognitive control demands across four task domains: selective attention, context processing, multi-tasking, and working memory. Healthy young adult monozygotic twin pairs exhibited increased similarity of within- and cross-task activation patterns in these fronto-parietal regions, relative to unrelated pairs. Twin activation pattern similarity effects were clearest under high control demands, were not present in a set of task-unrelated parcels or due to anatomic similarity, and were primarily observed during the within-trial timepoints in which the control demands peaked. Together, these results indicate that twin similarity in the neural representation of cognitive control may be domain-general but also functionally and temporally specific in relation to the level of control demand. The findings suggest a genetic and/or environmental basis for individual variation in cognitive control function, and highlight the potential of twin-based neuroimaging designs for exploring heritability questions within this domain.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Conceptualization, T.S.B., R.T., and J.A.E.; Investigation, R.T. and A.K.; Formal Analysis, R.T. Writing – Original Draft, R.T. and T.S.B.; Writing – Review and Editing, R.T., T.S.B., J.A.E., and A.K.; Funding Acquisition, T.S.B.
Author contributions
ISSN:1053-8119
1095-9572
1095-9572
DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118415