Timing of Evidence-Based Nonsurgical Interventions as Part of Multimodal Treatment Guidelines for the Management of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Delphi Study

Abstract Objective Conservative management of cervical radiculopathy (CR) is a first treatment option because the risk–benefit ratio for surgery is less favorable. Systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines reporting on the effectiveness of nonsurgical management have not considered the tim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysical therapy Vol. 102; no. 5
Main Authors Thoomes, Erik, Thoomes-de Graaf, Marloes, Cleland, Joshua A, Gallina, Alessio, Falla, Deborah
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Oxford University Press 01.05.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Objective Conservative management of cervical radiculopathy (CR) is a first treatment option because the risk–benefit ratio for surgery is less favorable. Systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines reporting on the effectiveness of nonsurgical management have not considered the timing of management. The aim of this study was to establish consensus on effective nonsurgical treatment modalities at different stages (ie, acute, subacute, or chronic) of CR using the Delphi method approach. Methods Through an iterative multistage process, experts within the field rated their agreement with a list of proposed treatment modalities according to the stage of CR and could suggest missing treatment modalities. Agreement was measured using a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were used to measure agreement (median, interquartile ranges, and percentage of agreement). Consensus criteria were defined a priori for each round. Consensus for Round 3 was based on ≥2 of the following: a median Likert scale value of ≥4, interquartile range value of ≤1, and/or a percentage of agreement ≥70%. Results Data analysis produced a consensus list of effective treatment modalities in different stages of recovery. Conclusion According to experts, the focus of multimodal management in the acute stage should consist of patient education and spinal manipulative therapy, specific (foraminal opening) exercises, and sustained pain-relieving positions. In the subacute stage, increasing individualized physical activity including supervised motor control, specific exercises, and/or neurodynamic mobilization could be added. In the chronic stage, focus should shift to include general aerobic exercise as well as focused strength training. Postural education and vocational ergonomic assessment should also be considered. Impact Multimodal conservative management of individuals with CR should take the stage of the condition into consideration. The focus of therapeutic interventions should shift from passive pain-relieving intervention in the acute stage to increasingly more individualized physical activity and self-management in the chronic stage.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0031-9023
1538-6724
1538-6724
DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzab312