Harmonization of cortical thickness measurements across scanners and sites
With the proliferation of multi-site neuroimaging studies, there is a greater need for handling non-biological variance introduced by differences in MRI scanners and acquisition protocols. Such unwanted sources of variation, which we refer to as “scanner effects”, can hinder the detection of imaging...
Saved in:
Published in | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Vol. 167; pp. 104 - 120 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
15.02.2018
Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | With the proliferation of multi-site neuroimaging studies, there is a greater need for handling non-biological variance introduced by differences in MRI scanners and acquisition protocols. Such unwanted sources of variation, which we refer to as “scanner effects”, can hinder the detection of imaging features associated with clinical covariates of interest and cause spurious findings. In this paper, we investigate scanner effects in two large multi-site studies on cortical thickness measurements across a total of 11 scanners. We propose a set of tools for visualizing and identifying scanner effects that are generalizable to other modalities. We then propose to use ComBat, a technique adopted from the genomics literature and recently applied to diffusion tensor imaging data, to combine and harmonize cortical thickness values across scanners. We show that ComBat removes unwanted sources of scan variability while simultaneously increasing the power and reproducibility of subsequent statistical analyses. We also show that ComBat is useful for combining imaging data with the goal of studying life-span trajectories in the brain.
•Cortical thickness (CT) measurements are highly scanner specific.•Identifying scanner effects is crucial for inference and biomarker development.•We propose to use ComBat to harmonize cortical thickness values across scanners. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Equal contribution |
ISSN: | 1053-8119 1095-9572 1095-9572 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.024 |