Dissection of the Sylvian Fissure in the Trans-sylvian Approach Based on the Morphological Classification of the Superficial Middle Cerebral Vein

• Published in: Neurologia medico-chirurgica Vol. 61; no. 12; pp. 731 - 740
• Main Authors: IMADA, Yasutaka, MIHARA, Chie, KAWAMOTO, Hitoshi, KURISU, Kaoru
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English; Japanese
• Published: Japan The Japan Neurosurgical Society 01.01.2021; THE JAPAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY; Japan Science and Technology Agency
• Subjects: Cerebral Cortex - diagnostic imaging; Cerebral Cortex - surgery; Cerebral Veins - diagnostic imaging; Cerebral Veins - surgery; Classification; Dissection; frontosylvian vein; Humans; Infarction; Morphology; Original; Retrospective Studies; superficial middle cerebral vein; temporosylvian vein; trans-sylvian approach; Veins & arteries; frontosylvian vein; trans-sylvian approach; superficial middle cerebral vein; temporosylvian vein
• ISSN: 0470-8105; 1349-8029
• DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2021-0080

The superficial middle cerebral vein (SMCV) is one of the main factors that can impede a wide opening of the sylvian fissure. To reveal the most efficient SMCV dissection for a wide operative field while preserving the veins in the trans-sylvian approach, we retrospectively investigated the SMCVs through intraoperative video images. We characterized the SMCV as composed of the frontosylvian trunk (FST; receiving frontosylvian veins [FSVs] or parietosylvian veins [PSVs]), the temporosylvian trunk (TST; receiving temporosylvian veins [TSVs]), and the superficial middle cerebral common trunk (SMCCT; receiving both FSV/PSV and TSV), and classified the SMCVs of the 116 patients into 5 types based on the morphological classification of the SMCV. Type A SMCV (60.4%) with the SMCCT anastomosed to the frontal side had few bridging veins (BVs) between the SMCCT and the temporal side during dissection. Type B (7.8%) had the SMCCT with no anastomoses to the frontal side. In Type C (17.2%) consisting of the FST and TST and Type D (12.9%) with a merging of the vein of Trolard and Labbé posteriorly and the SMCVs dividing into the FST and the TST again proximally, there were few BVs between the FST and the TST during dissection. Finally, in Type E (1.7%) showing an undeveloped SMCV, there were no BVs between the frontal and the temporal lobes. Postoperative venous infarction occurred in 2.6%. Morphological classification of the SMCV can inform appropriate dissection line to create a wide operative field while preserving the veins in the trans-sylvian approach.