Does relative remoteness affect chronic disease outcomes? Geographic variation in chronic disease mortality in Australia, 2002–2006

To examine the variation of chronic disease mortality by remoteness areas of Australia, including states and territories. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) death registration data, by Statistical Local Area (SLA), were used to identify chronic disease mortality by remoteness category for states...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAustralian and New Zealand journal of public health Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 117 - 121
Main Authors Chondur, Ramakrishna, Li, Shu Qin, Guthridge, Steven, Lawton, Paul
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Australia Elsevier B.V 01.04.2014
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Elsevier Limited
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To examine the variation of chronic disease mortality by remoteness areas of Australia, including states and territories. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) death registration data, by Statistical Local Area (SLA), were used to identify chronic disease mortality by remoteness category for states and territories and Australia. The analysis used multiple cause of death for six common chronic diseases: diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, stroke, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and renal disease. ABS correspondence files were used to adjust the SLA level death records and population. The chronic disease mortality rate for Australian residents living in a very remote area (512 per 100,000 persons) was respectively 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 times higher than Remote, Outer Regional, Inner Regional and Major Cities categories. This pattern was consistent for the two age groups of 35–64 years and 65 years and over, all six chronic diseases and all states and territories except Victoria. This study shows that chronic disease mortality increases with increasing relative remoteness. The results highlight the importance and opportunity to redress poorer health outcomes for rural and remote area populations. The study is limited by absence of reliable Indigenous identification in national death data.
Bibliography:istex:7B63BF588E51E5BF45E802B3822600A5432274E0
ark:/67375/WNG-8MT1XPP5-X
ArticleID:AZPH12126
The authors have stated they have no conflict of interest.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1326-0200
1753-6405
DOI:10.1111/1753-6405.12126