Comparison of telomere length measurement methods
The strengths and limitations of the major methods developed to measure telomere lengths (TLs) in cells and tissues are presented in this review. These include Q-PCR (Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction), TRF (Terminal Restriction Fragment) analysis, a variety of Q-FISH (Quantitative Fluorescence...
Saved in:
Published in | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences Vol. 373; no. 1741; p. 20160451 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
The Royal Society
05.03.2018
The Royal Society Publishing |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The strengths and limitations of the major methods developed to measure telomere lengths (TLs) in cells and tissues are presented in this review. These include Q-PCR (Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction), TRF (Terminal Restriction Fragment) analysis, a variety of Q-FISH (Quantitative Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization) methods, STELA (Single TElomere Length Analysis) and TeSLA (Telomere Shortest Length Assay). For each method, we will cover information about validation studies, including reproducibility in independent laboratories, accuracy, reliability and sensitivity for measuring not only the average but also the shortest telomeres. There is substantial evidence that it is the shortest telomeres that trigger DNA damage responses leading to replicative senescence in mammals. However, the most commonly used TL measurement methods generally provide information on average or relative TL, but it is the shortest telomeres that leads to telomere dysfunction (identified by TIF, Telomere dysfunction Induced Foci) and limit cell proliferation in the absence of a telomere maintenance mechanism, such as telomerase. As the length of the shortest telomeres is a key biomarker determining cell fate and the onset of senescence, a new technique (TeSLA) that provides quantitative information about all the shortest telomeres will be highlighted.
This article is part of the theme issue ‘Understanding diversity in telomere dynamics’. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Theme issue ‘Understanding diversity in telomere dynamics’ compiled and edited by Pat Monaghan, Dan Eisenberg, Lea Harrington and Dan Nussey ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 One contribution of 19 to a theme issue ‘Understanding diversity in telomere dynamics’. |
ISSN: | 0962-8436 1471-2970 |
DOI: | 10.1098/rstb.2016.0451 |