Optimal background matching camouflage

• Published in: Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Vol. 284; no. 1858; p. 20170709
• Main Authors: Michalis, Constantine, Scott-Samuel, Nicholas E., Gibson, David P., Cuthill, Innes C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England The Royal Society 12.07.2017; The Royal Society Publishing
• Edition: Royal Society (Great Britain)
• Subjects: Animal Coloration; Animals; Behaviour; Birds; Birds - physiology; Camouflage; Color; Color matching; Crypsis; Defensive Coloration; Environment; Humans; Optimization; Pigmentation; Polymorphism; Predation; Predatory Behavior; Prey; Statistical analysis; Statistical methods; Visual Perception; Visual Search; crypsis; defensive coloration; camouflage; visual search; animal coloration
• ISSN: 0962-8452; 1471-2954; 1471-2954
• DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0709

Background matching is the most familiar and widespread camouflage strategy: avoiding detection by having a similar colour and pattern to the background. Optimizing background matching is straightforward in a homogeneous environment, or when the habitat has very distinct sub-types and there is divergent selection leading to polymorphism. However, most backgrounds have continuous variation in colour and texture, so what is the best solution? Not all samples of the background are likely to be equally inconspicuous, and laboratory experiments on birds and humans support this view. Theory suggests that the most probable background sample (in the statistical sense), at the size of the prey, would, on average, be the most cryptic. We present an analysis, based on realistic assumptions about low-level vision, that estimates the distribution of background colours and visual textures, and predicts the best camouflage. We present data from a field experiment that tests and supports our predictions, using artificial moth-like targets under bird predation. Additionally, we present analogous data for humans, under tightly controlled viewing conditions, searching for targets on a computer screen. These data show that, in the absence of predator learning, the best single camouflage pattern for heterogeneous backgrounds is the most probable sample.