Independent evaluation of 12 artificial intelligence solutions for the detection of tuberculosis

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 23895
• Main Authors: Codlin, Andrew J., Dao, Thang Phuoc, Vo, Luan Nguyen Quang, Forse, Rachel J., Van Truong, Vinh, Dang, Ha Minh, Nguyen, Lan Huu, Nguyen, Hoa Binh, Nguyen, Nhung Viet, Sidney-Annerstedt, Kristi, Squire, Bertie, Lönnroth, Knut, Caws, Maxine
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 13.12.2021; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 631/114/1305; 692/308/174; Adolescent; Adult; Artificial intelligence; Computer programs; Female; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Machine Learning - standards; Male; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Middle Aged; multidisciplinary; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - standards; Radiography; Radiography, Thoracic - methods; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Software; Software - standards; Tuberculosis; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnostic imaging
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03265-0

There have been few independent evaluations of computer-aided detection (CAD) software for tuberculosis (TB) screening, despite the rapidly expanding array of available CAD solutions. We developed a test library of chest X-ray (CXR) images which was blindly re-read by two TB clinicians with different levels of experience and then processed by 12 CAD software solutions. Using Xpert MTB/RIF results as the reference standard, we compared the performance characteristics of each CAD software against both an Expert and Intermediate Reader, using cut-off thresholds which were selected to match the sensitivity of each human reader. Six CAD systems performed on par with the Expert Reader (Qure.ai, DeepTek, Delft Imaging, JF Healthcare, OXIPIT, and Lunit) and one additional software (Infervision) performed on par with the Intermediate Reader only. Qure.ai, Delft Imaging and Lunit were the only software to perform significantly better than the Intermediate Reader. The majority of these CAD software showed significantly lower performance among participants with a past history of TB. The radiography equipment used to capture the CXR image was also shown to affect performance for some CAD software. TB program implementers now have a wide selection of quality CAD software solutions to utilize in their CXR screening initiatives.