Compounds targeting disulfide bond forming enzyme DsbB of Gram-negative bacteria

In bacteria, disulfide bonds confer stability on many proteins exported to the cell envelope or beyond. These proteins include numerous bacterial virulence factors, and thus bacterial enzymes that promote disulfide bond formation represent targets for compounds inhibiting bacterial virulence. Here,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature chemical biology Vol. 11; no. 4; pp. 292 - 298
Main Authors Landeta, Cristina, Blazyk, Jessica L, Hatahet, Feras, Meehan, Brian M, Eser, Markus, Myrick, Alissa, Bronstain, Ludmila, Minami, Shoko, Arnold, Holly, Ke, Na, Rubin, Eric J, Furie, Barbara C, Furie, Bruce, Beckwith, Jon, Dutton, Rachel, Boyd, Dana
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Nature Publishing Group 01.04.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In bacteria, disulfide bonds confer stability on many proteins exported to the cell envelope or beyond. These proteins include numerous bacterial virulence factors, and thus bacterial enzymes that promote disulfide bond formation represent targets for compounds inhibiting bacterial virulence. Here, we describe a new target- and cell-based screening methodology for identifying compounds that inhibit the disulfide bond-forming enzymes Escherichia coli DsbB (EcDsbB) or Mycobacterium tuberculosis VKOR (MtbVKOR), which can replace EcDsbB, although the two are not homologs. Initial screening of 51,487 compounds yielded six specifically inhibiting EcDsbB. These compounds share a structural motif and do not inhibit MtbVKOR. A medicinal chemistry approach led us to select related compounds, some of which are much more effective DsbB inhibitors than those found in the screen. These compounds inhibit purified DsbB and prevent anaerobic growth of E. coli. Furthermore, these compounds inhibit all but one of the DsbBs of nine other Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria tested.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
(current address) FAS Center for Systems Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
(current address) School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
(current address) New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA 01938, USA
Contributed equally to this work.
M.E. developed the agar assay. J.L.B., M.E., R.D., H.A., N.K., and D.B. performed the HTS. J.L.B. performed cherry-pick tests. J.L.B. and C.L performed inhibitor retests. C.L. performed substructure analysis, in vivo DsbA and DsbB inhibition and other gram-negative bacteria assays. F.H. performed enzyme kinetics and in vitro analysis. B.M.M performed anaerobic and M. smegmatis growth assays. M.B., B.C.F., and B.F. performed in vitro mice VKOR assays. A.M., S.M., and E.J.R. performed M. tuberculosis growth assays. C.L., J.L.B., F.H., B.M.M., D.B. and J.B. analyzed and discussed the data. C.L. and J.B. wrote the paper.
Authors contributions
ISSN:1552-4450
1552-4469
DOI:10.1038/nchembio.1752