Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant
A double-blind randomized trial in South Africa documented poor efficacy of two doses of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variant of SARS-CoV-2 that emerged in South Africa. Infections occurred in 3.2% of placebo recipients and in 2.5% of vaccine recipients. Thirty-nine of the 42 viru...
Saved in:
Published in | New England Journal of Medicine Vol. 384; no. 20; pp. 1885 - 1898 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article Web Resource |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Massachusetts Medical Society
20.05.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | A double-blind randomized trial in South Africa documented poor efficacy of two doses of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variant of SARS-CoV-2 that emerged in South Africa. Infections occurred in 3.2% of placebo recipients and in 2.5% of vaccine recipients. Thirty-nine of the 42 virus isolates were the B.1.351 variant. None of the cases led to hospitalization or death. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | The members of the Wits–VIDA COVID Group are listed in the Supplementary Appendix, available at NEJM.org. Drs. Baillie, Cutland, Gilbert, Pollard, de Oliveira, Moore, Sigal, and Izu and Drs. Koen, Fairlie, Padayachee, Dheda, Barnabas, Bhorat, and Briner contributed equally to this article. |
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMoa2102214 |