Individual variation in cognitive performance: developmental and evolutionary perspectives

• Published in: Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences Vol. 367; no. 1603; pp. 2773 - 2783
• Main Authors: Thornton, Alex, Lukas, Dieter
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England The Royal Society 05.10.2012
• Subjects: Adaptation, Physiological; Animals; Behavior, Animal - physiology; Biological Evolution; Chimpanzees; Cognition; Cognition - physiology; Competitive Behavior - physiology; Development; Environment; Evolution; Experimentation; Genetic Fitness - physiology; Genetic variation; Humans; Individual Differences; Individuality; Inheritance Patterns; Learning - physiology; Materials; Meta-Analysis; Phenotypic traits; Reproductive Fitness; Review; Sample size; Tool Use Behavior - physiology
• ISSN: 0962-8436; 1471-2970; 1471-2970
• DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0214

Animal cognition experiments frequently reveal striking individual variation but rarely consider its causes and largely ignore its potential consequences. Studies often focus on a subset of high-performing subjects, sometimes viewing evidence from a single individual as sufficient to demonstrate the cognitive capacity of a species. We argue that the emphasis on demonstrating species-level cognitive capacities detracts from the value of individual variation in understanding cognitive development and evolution. We consider developmental and evolutionary interpretations of individual variation and use meta-analyses of data from published studies to examine predictors of individual performance. We show that reliance on small sample sizes precludes robust conclusions about individual abilities as well as inter- and intraspecific differences. We advocate standardization of experimental protocols and pooling of data between laboratories to improve statistical rigour. Our analyses show that cognitive performance is influenced by age, sex, rearing conditions and previous experience. These effects limit the validity of comparative analyses unless developmental histories are taken into account, and complicate attempts to understand how cognitive traits are expressed and selected under natural conditions. Further understanding of cognitive evolution requires efforts to elucidate the heritability of cognitive traits and establish whether elevated cognitive performance confers fitness advantages in nature.