A sex-specific trade-off between mating preferences for genetic compatibility and body size in a cichlid fish with mutual mate choice

Mating preferences for genetic compatibility strictly depend on the interplay of the genotypes of potential partners and are therein fundamentally different from directional preferences for ornamental secondary sexual traits. Thus, the most compatible partner is on average not the one with most pron...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Vol. 279; no. 1740; pp. 2959 - 2964
Main Authors Thünken, Timo, Meuthen, Denis, Bakker, Theo C. M., Baldauf, Sebastian A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England The Royal Society 07.08.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Mating preferences for genetic compatibility strictly depend on the interplay of the genotypes of potential partners and are therein fundamentally different from directional preferences for ornamental secondary sexual traits. Thus, the most compatible partner is on average not the one with most pronounced ornaments and vice versa. Hence, mating preferences may often conflict. Here, we present a solution to this problem while investigating the interplay of mating preferences for relatedness (a compatibility criterion) and large body size (an ornamental or quality trait). In previous experiments, both sexes of Pelvicachromis taeniatus, a cichlid fish with mutual mate choice, showed preferences for kin and large partners when these criteria were tested separately. In the present study, test fish were given a conflicting choice between two potential mating partners differing in relatedness as well as in body size in such a way that preferences for both criteria could not simultaneously be satisfied. We show that a sex-specific trade-off occurs between mating preferences for body size and relatedness. For females, relatedness gained greater importance than body size, whereas the opposite was true for males. We discuss the potential role of the interplay between mating preferences for relatedness and body size for the evolution of inbreeding preference.
Bibliography:href:rspb20120333.pdf
ArticleID:rspb20120333
istex:9994E3A3A89C29E202B33C484C7ECEAD40A5DB0F
ark:/67375/V84-B0FH2CS9-F
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0962-8452
1471-2954
DOI:10.1098/rspb.2012.0333