8-Plex quantitation of changes in cerebrospinal fluid protein expression in subjects undergoing intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for Alzheimer's disease

An 8-plex version of an isobaric reagent for the quantitation of proteins using shotgun methods is presented. The 8-plex version of the reagent relies on amine-labeling chemistry of peptides similar to 4-plex reagents. MS/MS reporter ions at 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, and 121 m/z are used to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProteomics (Weinheim) Vol. 7; no. 20; pp. 3651 - 3660
Main Authors Choe, Leila, D'Ascenzo, Mark, Relkin, Norman R, Pappin, Darryl, Ross, Philip, Williamson, Brian, Guertin, Steven, Pribil, Patrick, Lee, Kelvin H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Weinheim Wiley-VCH Verlag 01.10.2007
WILEY-VCH Verlag
WILEY‐VCH Verlag
Wiley-VCH
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:An 8-plex version of an isobaric reagent for the quantitation of proteins using shotgun methods is presented. The 8-plex version of the reagent relies on amine-labeling chemistry of peptides similar to 4-plex reagents. MS/MS reporter ions at 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, and 121 m/z are used to quantify protein expression. This technology which was first applied to a test mixture consisting of eight proteins and resulted in accurate quantitation, has the potential to increase throughput of analysis for quantitative shotgun proteomics experiments when compared to 2- and 4-plex methods. The technology was subsequently applied to a longitudinal study of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteins from subjects undergoing intravenous Ig treatment for Alzheimer's disease. Results from this study identify a number of protein expression changes that occur in CSF after 3 and 6 months of treatment compared to a baseline and compared to a drug washout period. A visualization tool was developed for this dataset and is presented. The tool can aid in the identification of key peptides and measurements. One conclusion aided by the visualization tool is that there are differences in considering peptide-based observations versus protein-based observations from quantitative shotgun proteomics studies.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200700316
istex:E5D949A18F756B4EAB6D22CE42CCCAAA909A46F7
ark:/67375/WNG-PMNNKX30-F
ArticleID:PMIC200700316
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1615-9853
1615-9861
DOI:10.1002/pmic.200700316