Scientific Statement on the Diagnostic Criteria, Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Molecular Genetics of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous and complex disorder that has both adverse reproductive and metabolic implications for affected women. However, there is generally poor understanding of its etiology. Varying expert-based diagnostic criteria utilize some combination of oligo-ovulat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEndocrine reviews Vol. 36; no. 5; pp. 487 - 525
Main Authors Dumesic, Daniel A, Oberfield, Sharon E, Stener-Victorin, Elisabet, Marshall, John C, Laven, Joop S, Legro, Richard S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Endocrine Society 01.10.2015
Copyright by The Endocrine Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous and complex disorder that has both adverse reproductive and metabolic implications for affected women. However, there is generally poor understanding of its etiology. Varying expert-based diagnostic criteria utilize some combination of oligo-ovulation, hyperandrogenism, and the presence of polycystic ovaries. Criteria that require hyperandrogenism tend to identify a more severe reproductive and metabolic phenotype. The phenotype can vary by race and ethnicity, is difficult to define in the perimenarchal and perimenopausal period, and is exacerbated by obesity. The pathophysiology involves abnormal gonadotropin secretion from a reduced hypothalamic feedback response to circulating sex steroids, altered ovarian morphology and functional changes, and disordered insulin action in a variety of target tissues. PCOS clusters in families and both female and male relatives can show stigmata of the syndrome, including metabolic abnormalities. Genome-wide association studies have identified a number of candidate regions, although their role in contributing to PCOS is still largely unknown.
Bibliography:This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants 1R01HD056510, 2 U54 HD034449, and 2 U10 HD 38992 and by University of Virginia Grant U54 HD 28934.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0163-769X
1945-7189
1945-7189
DOI:10.1210/er.2015-1018