Family members’ experiences of “wait and see” as a communication strategy in end-of-life decisions

• Published in: Intensive care medicine Vol. 37; no. 7; pp. 1143 - 1150
• Main Authors: Lind, Ranveig, Lorem, Geir F., Nortvedt, Per, Hevrøy, Olav
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01.07.2011; Springer; Springer Nature B.V; Springer Verlag
• Subjects: Adult; Age; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy; Anesthesiology; Biological and medical sciences; Clinical medical disciplines: 750; Communication; Community medicine, Social medicine: 801; Critical Care Medicine; Decision Making; Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care; Emergency Medicine; Family - psychology; Female; Grounded theory; Health sciences: 800; Helsefag: 800; Hospital patients; Hospitals; Humans; Intensive; Intensive care; Intensive care medicine; Intensive Care Units; Interviews as Topic; Klinisk medisinske fag: 750; Legislation; Male; Medical disciplines: 700; Medical sciences; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Medisinske Fag: 700; Middle Aged; Norway; Nurses; Original; Pain Medicine; Patients rights; Pediatrics; Physicians; Pneumology/Respiratory System; Qualitative research; Samfunnsmedisin, sosialmedisin: 801; Terminal Care; Traumatologi: 783; Traumatology: 783; VDP; Norway; Decision-making; Intensive care; End of life; Family members; Communication; Decision making; End of life decision; Resuscitation
• ISSN: 0342-4642; 1432-1238
• DOI: 10.1007/s00134-011-2253-x

Purpose The aim of this study is to examine family members’ experiences of end-of-life decision-making processes in Norwegian intensive care units (ICUs) to ascertain the degree to which they felt included in the decision-making process and whether they received necessary information. Were they asked about the patient’s preferences, and how did they view their role as family members in the decision-making process? Methods A constructivist interpretive approach to the grounded theory method of qualitative research was employed with interviews of 27 bereaved family members of former ICU patients 3–12 months after the patient’s death. Results The core finding is that relatives want a more active role in end-of-life decision-making in order to communicate the patient’s wishes. However, many consider their role to be unclear, and few study participants experienced shared decision-making. The clinician’s expression “wait and see” hides and delays the communication of honest and clear information. When physicians finally address their decision, there is no time for family participation. Our results also indicate that nurses should be more involved in family–physician communication. Conclusions Families are uncertain whether or how they can participate in the decision-making process. They need unambiguous communication and honest information to be able to take part in the decision-making process. We suggest that clinicians in Norwegian ICUs need more training in the knowledge and skills of effective communication with families of dying patients.