Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR): An Item Response Theory Analysis

• Published in: Journal of personality assessment Vol. 96; no. 4; pp. 417 - 425
• Main Authors: Pilkonis, Paul A., Kim, Yookyung, Yu, Lan, Morse, Jennifer Q.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Philadelphia, PA Routledge 04.07.2014; Taylor & Francis; Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
• Subjects: Adult; Anxiety disorders; Attachment; Avoidance behaviour; Biological and medical sciences; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Humans; Interpersonal Relations; Item response theory; Male; Measurement; Middle Aged; Object Attachment; Personality disorders; Personality. Affectivity; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data; Psychological tests; Psychological Theory; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Psychometrics; Ratings & rankings; Selfreport; Human; Affect affectivity; Affective attachment; Evaluation scale; Item response theory; Psychometrics; Adult
• ISSN: 0022-3891; 1532-7752
• DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2013.832261

The Adult Attachment Ratings (AAR) include 3 scales for anxious, ambivalent attachment (excessive dependency, interpersonal ambivalence, and compulsive care-giving), 3 for avoidant attachment (rigid self-control, defensive separation, and emotional detachment), and 1 for secure attachment. The scales include items (ranging from 6-16 in their original form) scored by raters using a 3-point format (0 = absent, 1 = present, and 2 = strongly present) and summed to produce a total score. Item response theory (IRT) analyses were conducted with data from 414 participants recruited from psychiatric outpatient, medical, and community settings to identify the most informative items from each scale. The IRT results allowed us to shorten the scales to 5-item versions that are more precise and easier to rate because of their brevity. In general, the effective range of measurement for the scales was 0 to +2 SDs for each of the attachment constructs; that is, from average to high levels of attachment problems. Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity of the scales was investigated by comparing them with the Experiences of Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) scale and the Kobak Attachment Q-sort. The best consensus among self-reports on the ECR-R, informant ratings on the ECR-R, and expert judgments on the Q-sort and the AAR emerged for anxious, ambivalent attachment. Given the good psychometric characteristics of the scale for secure attachment, however, this measure alone might provide a simple alternative to more elaborate procedures for some measurement purposes. Conversion tables are provided for the 7 scales to facilitate transformation from raw scores to IRT-calibrated (theta) scores.