Binding constraints on the evolution of enzymes and signalling proteins: the important role of negative pleiotropy

A number of biophysical and population-genetic processes influence amino acid substitution rates. It is commonly recognized that proteins must fold into a native structure with preference over an unfolded state, and must bind to functional interacting partners favourably to function properly. What i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Vol. 278; no. 1714; pp. 1930 - 1935
Main Authors Liberles, David A., Tisdell, Makayla D. M., Grahnen, Johan A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England The Royal Society 07.07.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A number of biophysical and population-genetic processes influence amino acid substitution rates. It is commonly recognized that proteins must fold into a native structure with preference over an unfolded state, and must bind to functional interacting partners favourably to function properly. What is less clear is how important folding and binding specificity are to amino acid substitution rates. A hypothesis of the importance of binding specificity in constraining sequence and functional evolution is presented. Examples include an evolutionary simulation of a population of SH2 sequences evolved by threading through the structure and binding to a native ligand, as well as SH3 domain signalling in yeast and selection for specificity in enzymatic reactions. An example in vampire bats where negative pleiotropy appears to have been adaptive is presented. Finally, considerations of compartmentalization and macromolecular crowding on negative pleiotropy are discussed.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/V84-6G4M9Z0R-3
istex:42A02789D717187F891979704038073ADCC8EA56
href:rspb20102637.pdf
ArticleID:rspb20102637
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0962-8452
1471-2945
1471-2954
DOI:10.1098/rspb.2010.2637