Utility of an obstacle-crossing test to classify future fallers and non-fallers at hospital discharge after stroke: A pilot study

Existing clinical assessments of balance and functional mobility have poor predictive accuracy for prospectively identifying post-stroke fallers, which may be due to a lack of ecological complexity that is typical of community-based fall incidents. Does an obstacle-crossing test at hospital discharg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGait & posture Vol. 96; no. NA; pp. 179 - 184
Main Authors Feld, Jody A., Goode, Adam P., Mercer, Vicki S., Plummer, Prudence
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier B.V 01.07.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Existing clinical assessments of balance and functional mobility have poor predictive accuracy for prospectively identifying post-stroke fallers, which may be due to a lack of ecological complexity that is typical of community-based fall incidents. Does an obstacle-crossing test at hospital discharge predict fall status of ambulatory stroke survivors 3 months after discharge? Ambulatory stroke survivors being discharged home completed an obstacle-crossing test at hospital discharge. Falls were tracked prospectively for 3 months after discharge. Logistic regression examined the relationship between obstacle-crossing at discharge (pass/fail) and fall status (faller/non-faller) at 3 months post discharge. 45 participants had discharge obstacle test and 3-month fall data. 21 (47 %) participants experienced at least one fall during follow-up, with 52 % of the falls occurring within the first month after discharge. Of the 21 fallers, 14 failed the obstacle-crossing test (67 % sensitivity). Among the 24 non-fallers, 20 passed the obstacle-crossing test (83 % specificity). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.75 (95 % CI 0.60–0.90). Individuals who failed the obstacle-crossing test were 10.00 (95 % CI: 2.45–40.78) times more likely to fall in the first 3 months after discharge. The unadjusted logistic regression model correctly classified 76 % of the subjects. After adjusting for age, sex, days post stroke, and post-stroke disability, the odds ratio remained significant at 6.93 (95 % CI: 1.01–47.52) and correctly classified 79.5% of the participants. The obstacle-crossing test may be a useful discharge assessment to identify ambulatory stroke survivors being discharged home who are likely to fall in the first 3 months post discharge. Modifications to improve the obstacle-crossing test sensitivity should be explored further. •Failure to step over an obstacle appears strongly related to future fall status.•Realistic and challenging mobility tasks may improve post-stroke fall prediction.•Post-stroke fallers have greater lower extremity impairments at hospital discharge.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0966-6362
1879-2219
1879-2219
DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.05.037