New behavioural trait adopted or rejected by observing heterospecific tutor fitness

• Published in: Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Vol. 278; no. 1712; pp. 1736 - 1741
• Main Authors: Seppänen, Janne-Tuomas, Forsman, Jukka T., Mönkkönen, Mikko, Krams, Indrikis, Salmi, Tuuli
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England The Royal Society 07.06.2011
• Subjects: Adaptation, Physiological; Animal Culture; Animal nesting; Animal Traditions; Animals; Bird nesting; Choice Behavior; Conservation biology; Copying; Female; Female animals; Flycatchers; Imitative Behavior; Learning Bias; Nesting Behavior; Niche Overlap; Observed choices; Passeriformes - physiology; Personality traits; Social Environment; Social Learning; Species; Tutoring
• ISSN: 0962-8452; 1471-2945; 1471-2954
• DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1610

Animals can acquire behaviours from others, including heterospecifics, but should be discriminating in when and whom to copy. Successful individuals should be preferred as tutors, while adopting traits of poorly performing individuals should be actively avoided. Thus far it is unknown if such adaptive strategies are involved when individuals copy other species. Furthermore, rejection of traits based on tutor characteristics (negative bias) has not been shown in any non-human animal. Here we test whether a choice between two new, neutral behavioural alternatives—breeding-sites with alternative geometric symbols—is affected by observing the choice and fitness of a heterospecific tutor. A field experiment replicated in four different areas shows that the proportion of pied flycatcher females matching the choice of the tit tutor consistently increased with increasing number of offspring in the tit nest, to the extent of nearly complete prevalence in one of the areas when tit fitness was highest. Notably, all four replicates demonstrate rejection of the behaviour of lowest-fitness tutors. The results demonstrate both acquisition and avoidance of heterospecific behavioural traits, based on the perceived (lack of) tutor fitness. This has potential implications for understanding the origin, diversity and local adaptations of behavioural traits, and niche overlap/partitioning and species co-occurrence.