Heart rate recovery and blood pressure response during exercise testing in patients with microvascular angina

Angina pectoris with a normal coronary angiogram, termed microvascular angina (MVA), is an important clinical entity; however, its causes remain unclear. Autonomic dysfunction is one of the possible causes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate parasympathetic dysfunction assessed by heart rate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical hypertension Vol. 25; no. 1; p. 4
Main Authors Kim, Bong-Joon, Jo, Eun-Ah, Im, Sung-Il, Kim, Hyun-Su, Heo, Jung Ho, Cho, Kyoung-Im
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 01.03.2019
BioMed Central
BMC
대한고혈압학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Angina pectoris with a normal coronary angiogram, termed microvascular angina (MVA), is an important clinical entity; however, its causes remain unclear. Autonomic dysfunction is one of the possible causes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate parasympathetic dysfunction assessed by heart rate recovery (HRR) and increased sympathetic activity assessed by exaggerated blood pressure (BP) response (EBPR) to exercise in MVA. The study participants were consecutive patients with anginal chest pain who underwent both coronary angiography with an ergonovine provocation test and a treadmill exercise test between January 2008 and February 2015. Patients with significant coronary artery disease (coronary artery stenosis ≥50%) or significant coronary artery spasm (≥90%) were excluded. Based on the treadmill exercise test, patients were categorized into the microvascular angina (MVA) group (patients with uniform ST depression ≥1 mm) and the control group. HRR was defined as peak heart rate minus heart rate after a 1 min recovery; blunted HRR was defined as ≤12 beats/min. EBPR was defined as a peak exercise systolic BP ≥210 mmHg in men and ≥ 190 mmHg in women. These parameters were compared between patients with MVA and the controls. Among the 970 enrolled patients (mean age 53.1 years; female 59.0%), 191 (20.0%) were diagnosed with MVA. In baseline characteristics, the MVA group had older participants, female predominance, and a higher prevalence of hypertension. The MVA group showed significantly lower HRR 1 min (24.9 ± 15.9 vs. 31.3 ± 22.7,  <  0.001) compared with the control group. Moreover, the proportion of EBPR was significantly higher in the MVA group than in the control group (21.5% vs. 11.6%, p <  0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that age (odds ratio (OR), 1.045; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.026-1.064; p <  0.001), HRR 1 min (OR, 0.990; 95% CI, 0.982-0.999;  = 0.022), and EBPR (OR, 1.657; 95% CI, 1.074-2.554; p = 0.022) were independently associated with MVA. HRR and EBPR were associated with MVA, which suggests a link between MVA and autonomic dysregulation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
https://clinicalhypertension.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s40885-019-0108-x
ISSN:2056-5909
1342-2154
2635-6325
2056-5909
DOI:10.1186/s40885-019-0108-x