Uncertainty, epistemics and active inference

Biological systems—like ourselves—are constantly faced with uncertainty. Despite noisy sensory data, and volatile environments, creatures appear to actively maintain their integrity. To account for this remarkable ability to make optimal decisions in the face of a capricious world, we propose a gene...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the Royal Society interface Vol. 14; no. 136; p. 20170376
Main Authors Parr, Thomas, Friston, Karl J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England The Royal Society 01.11.2017
The Royal Society Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Biological systems—like ourselves—are constantly faced with uncertainty. Despite noisy sensory data, and volatile environments, creatures appear to actively maintain their integrity. To account for this remarkable ability to make optimal decisions in the face of a capricious world, we propose a generative model that represents the beliefs an agent might possess about their own uncertainty. By simulating a noisy and volatile environment, we demonstrate how uncertainty influences optimal epistemic (visual) foraging. In our simulations, saccades were deployed less frequently to regions with a lower sensory precision, while a greater volatility led to a shorter inhibition of return. These simulations illustrate a principled explanation for some cardinal aspects of visual foraging—and allow us to propose a correspondence between the representation of uncertainty and ascending neuromodulatory systems, complementing that suggested by Yu & Dayan (Yu & Dayan 2005 Neuron 46, 681–692. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.026)).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1742-5689
1742-5662
1742-5662
DOI:10.1098/rsif.2017.0376